Re: [DMM] Document Action: 'On Demand Mobility Management' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.txt)

Hi, And also the chairs of DMM and Suresh for extensive support and useful guidance. Thanks and regards, Danny -Original Message- From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2019 17:29 To: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org Cc: dmm@ietf.

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18: (with COMMENT)

Hi Again, Regarding your clarification about mobility being better served by the transport layer versus the application layer. This work is not about trying to find a better or more efficient way to handle mobility while preserving the transport connection. It is about enabling applications to

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.pdf Best regards, Danny -Original Message- From: Mirja Kuehlewind [mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 19:57 To: Moses, Danny Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; sgund...@cisco.com; dmm-cha...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-17.txt

nny -Original Message- From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@quantonium.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 18:26 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-17.txt On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:29 AM Moses, Danny wrote: > > Can you please provide

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-17.txt

Can you please provide a calling sequence of your proposal? Thanks, Danny -Original Message- From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@quantonium.net] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 17:17 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-17.txt On Mon, Mar 4

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-17.txt

Hi Tom, Fair question. I believe I mentioned that in one of my responses. The original definition was to use setsockopt() with new flags. However, some people raised the concern that this new feature changes the behavior of the function in a way that may confuse programmers and requested to us

Re: [DMM] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

and I hope I hit the issue that caused the confusion. Regards, Danny -Original Message- From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:ali...@cooperw.in] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 19:10 To: Moses, Danny Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm-cha...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.or

[DMM] New version of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility

Hi all, I have upload a new version (17) of the draft. Here is a summary of the changes to the draft after analyzing the different Last Call review and comments: Changes from Rev-16 to Rev-17 1. Remove the reference to section 4 of RFC7333 in the Abstract. Leave the reference to RFC7333.

Re: [DMM] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Alissa, Thanks for your comments. Following are me responses: DISCUSS (1): Normative requirements on "the IP stack" are too broad: I have checked all places that have normative requirements regarding "IP stack" in the document. Please see my response per instance: Section 3.4 - On Demand Natur

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, Thanks for your comments. I would like to start with responding to your last proposal to remove all socket API specifications from the document. Yes, we could do that. However, this is a significant modification and I would like some sort of ruff consensus from the rest of the reviewe

Re: [DMM] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-16

Hi Russ, Ack on both comments. Will be modified in the next revision. Thanks, Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Russ Housley Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 23:55 To: gen-...@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility@ietf.org; i...@ietf.

Re: [DMM] Rtgdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-15

Hi Jonathan, Thanks for the review and comments. Please see my response and actions below. 1. Change ‘solution’ to ‘API’ in the Abstract. I agree that ‘solution’ is misleading. The draft actually introduces the new concept of influencing the level of the network’s mobility service, and p

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11

Hi, I support WGLC for this draft. Danny From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 20:43 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-11 Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IE

Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

Hi, I support WGLC for this draft. Danny From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:43 PM Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 To: dmm@ietf.org mailto:dmm@ietf.org>> Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IE

Re: [DMM] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-15

Thanks for the feedback. I think I understand the concern. Perhaps it is partly due to not participating in the presentations and discussions that took place in DMM over the past several years. Let me try and add some more context. The desire to optimize mobility services is part of DMM's charte

Re: [DMM] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-15

Hi Russ, Thank you for your comments and questions. Please see the responses to each issue. I copied the comments and followed each one with a response for ease of review. Minor Concerns: Section 2: Please update the first paragraph to reference RFC 8174 in addition to RFC 2119, as follows:

[DMM] draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif ready for WGLC in my opinion

Hi dmm-ers, I would like to express my opinion after reading the previous version of draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif and providing comments, that the draft is ready for WGLC. It is a needed concept for distributed anchoring and was implemented and demoed in IETF several years ago. I am aware of the

[DMM] New version for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility

Hi, I have posted a new version for the draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility with changes addressing the comments of the early review - as discussed in the last dmm session. The changes include: 1. Replacing 'IP session continuity' with 'session continuity' and related changes throughout t

Re: [DMM] Response to the early review of draft-dmm-ondemand-mobility

Hi Sri, Thanks for the additional comments, they are in line with my views. I will discuss with Brian an update the WG as you recommended. Thanks, Danny From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 00:10 To: Moses, Danny ; dmm@ietf.org Cc: Brian

[DMM] Response to the early review of draft-dmm-ondemand-mobility

Hi all, This is the initial draft of the response to the Brian Haberman's early review of draft-dmm-ondemand-mobility. I would like to thank Brian for his review and provide the WG's response. Please see the first draft of the response below and provide comments. I think that the first issue re

Re: [DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items

review and provide feedback. Thanks, Danny From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 22:56 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: IETF102 - Call for agenda items Danny - Unless you are not able to resolve the comments that you have received

Re: [DMM] IETF102 - Call for agenda items

Hi, Please assign a slot for the following: Topic name: Response to early review of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-14 Presenter: Danny Moses Time: 15 minutes Draft Reference: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-14 Thanks, Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Hi, Adopting a draft as a WG draft does not mean that we accept it as is and plan not to improve it. It means that the WG agrees that it is something that we want to work on and that it aligns with the WG charter. So the fact that there are some fixes in the pipeline is irrelevant, in my opini

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Hi, I support making this draft a WG draft. BR, Danny From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 07:26 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document Folks: During I

Re: [DMM] New Liaison Statement, "LS on indicating service continuity usage of the additional IPv6 prefix in Router Advertisement"

Hi Alex, As you know, I have written a draft that defines an extension to DHCPv6 for supporting OnDemand values (also for SSC modes - Service and Session Continuity) with prefix delegation. I discussed that with SA2 people and they are aware of that possibility. Currently, SA2 prefer the RA mob

[DMM] New version to draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility - 14

Hi, I update the draft with some minor editorial fixes, mainly to the pseudo code part. These are mainly breaking long lines so that they do not exceed the 72nd column. You can continue addressing draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-13 for WGLC review - there are no other modifications. Thanks a

[DMM] Substantial comments on draft draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility

This message contains a list of substantial comments received for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility. These comments were received on the DMM mailing list, during DMM WG session and via other email exchange. They are ordered from most resent to older ones: *Provide on the mailing list, a

Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule

I am OK with the current structure. From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 23:45 To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] ; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule So, then I don't see the point of changing the curre

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document

I support the adoption of this draft. BR, Danny From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 02:21 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document P

Re: [DMM] Any comments on the new version of the OnDemand draft (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12 )?

ything else to be addressed? Thanks, Danny From: Moses, Danny Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2017 14:59 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Any comments on the new version of the OnDemand draft (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12 )? Hi everyone, Two weeks ago I posted a new version of draft-ietf-dmm-on

[DMM] Any comments on the new version of the OnDemand draft (draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12 )?

Hi everyone, Two weeks ago I posted a new version of draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12 including modifications addressing comments in the last DMM session. I also posted on this list text that describe the different session c

[DMM] New draft of draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility after dhc WG review

AT IETF98 (Chicago) I was request by the WG to present the draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility draft to the dhc group and have them review the DHCPv6 aspects of this draft. At IETF99 (Prague), I presented the draft and receive very useful comments and correction. The new draft includes all

[DMM] More info on the different OnDemand Session Continuity services

In IETF99 (Prague) we introduced the "Graceful-Replacement" session continuity service in addition to the services specified in previous versions as a result of 3GPP specifying SSC (Service and Session Continuity) mode 3. This led to some questions at IETF 99 regarding this new service and the n

[DMM] New version of the OnDemand draft: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-12

In IETF99 (Prague) the following comments/questions were raised regarding the OnDemand draft: 1. Need to clarify in the text that the setsc() API is blocking 2. It is not clear from the text that the APIs are abstract 3. How does this work merge with RFC5014? 4. Request fo

[DMM] OnDemand alternatives for blocking function call

Hi guys, A week ago I sent a memo describing several alternatives to resolve the issue of the blocking nature of the call to request a session continuity service (see - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/u0PmcSeOSQM6W80WbP7joeZv_l0 ). This was according to the directive that was agreed d

[DMM] Alternatives for using setsockopt() for OnDemand session continuity requests

At IETF 98, there was a request to avoid using setsockopt() as a blocking function for OnDemand as it is a function that is intended to merely set options and return immediately without waiting for external events (e.g., arrival of packets). Some alternatives include: *Adding a new bl

Re: [DMM] DMM Meeting Minutes

Hi, Scanned through the minutes, especially the topics I am more involved in. They look fine - no corrections from my side. Thanks Marco for the effort. Danny From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2017 18:03 To: dmm Subject: [

Re: [DMM] DMM IETF 98 meeting

Hi, Following is the info for the sessions I have requested: Title: On Demand Mobility Management Socket Extensions Description: Update on changes to the draft since IETF 97 Time: 15 minutes Presenter: Danny Moses Draft Reference: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-10

[DMM] New Version Notification for draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-05

From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 11:43 To: Alper Yegin ; Moses, Danny Subject: New Version Notification for draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-05.txt A new version of I-D, draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-05.txt has

[DMM] New version for the On-Demand draft: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-10

Hi, I have uploaded a new version including the text changes and usage example according to the comments received on the list. I am planning to discuss two final topics during IETF98 and hopefully we can resume WGLC and release the draft. Any comments? Thanks, Danny ---

Re: [DMM] DMM IETF 98 meeting

Hi, I would like two slots: ·15 minutes to discuss progress on the OnDemand Socket extensions (draft: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility) ·10 minutes to discuss changes in the OnDemand extensions for DHCPv6 (draft: draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility) Thanks, Danny From: dmm

[DMM] Blocking vs non-blocking function behavior

Hi, Another concern that was raised is regarding the blocking vs non-blocking behavior of the setsockopt() function with the new OnDemand feature. Lorenzo, in one of his comments, suggested to consider adding a new function with a blocking nature, in order not to surprise application developers

[DMM] Code sample for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility

I am including a code sample that I plan to add to the draft. Please review the code below and comment. There is another topic that we need to finalize regarding the blocking vs non-blocking nature of the setsockopt() function but I prefer to discuss it under a separate email to simplify the tra

Re: [DMM] New name for topic: Supporting both PMIP and MIP

final draft early January. Best regards ad happy holidays, Danny From: Dave Dolson [mailto:ddol...@sandvine.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 18:06 To: Moses, Danny ; Lorenzo Colitti Cc: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: [DMM] New name for topic: Supporting

Re: [DMM] New name for topic: Supporting both PMIP and MIP

the HOME address will be generated from an IP prefix with a network guarantee to be fixed. Does this text describe accurately your intention? Thanks, Danny From: Dave Dolson [mailto:ddol...@sandvine.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 16:35 To: Moses, Danny ; Lorenzo Colitti Cc: draft-ietf-dmm

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08 --

Cc: Moses, Danny ; draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08 -- rOn Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Dave Dolson mailto:ddol...@sandvine.com>> wrote: 5. Are there new errors from bind(), listen() or connect(), etc

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08 --

...@sandvine.com] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 21:00 To: Moses, Danny Cc: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08 -- I'm just catching up on the recent drafts, so apologies if this has been covered... 1. It seems like RFC 6724

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08 --

Oops, Sorry but I missed this email. Sorry. I will review the comments and if needed, will upload another version. Hope to complete the work by tomorrow. Regards, Danny From: Dave Dolson [mailto:ddol...@sandvine.com] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 21:00 To: Moses, Danny Cc: draft-ietf-dmm

[DMM] New OnDemand version - 09

Hi, I have uploaded a new version of the draft: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-09, addressing Lorenzo's comments (and fixing some typos). I would like to ask to continue the WGLC process on the newer version. Thanks, Danny -

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08

] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 17:20 To: Moses, Danny Cc: Peter McCann ; jouni.nospam ; draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08 Danny, I don't think assigning addresses vs. assigning prefixes is a question on

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08

lease time for prefixes (like DHCP does) and force the MN to request lease extensions – if they required. Could that be a reasonable approach? Danny From: Peter McCann [mailto:peter.mcc...@huawei.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 21:02 To: Moses, Danny ; Lorenzo Colitti Cc: draft-ietf-dmm

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08

That is correct. Do we need a draft about freeing addresses/prefixes? Regards, Danny From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter McCann Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 17:43 To: Lorenzo Colitti Cc: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC fo

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08

are configured. Does this make sense? Danny From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lore...@google.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 15:25 To: Moses, Danny Cc: Peter McCann ; jouni.nospam ; draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08

? Thanks, Danny From: Lorenzo Colitti [mailto:lore...@google.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 03:57 To: Moses, Danny Cc: Peter McCann ; jouni.nospam ; draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08 Danny, yes, there are

Re: [DMM] WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-08

Hi guys, I hope there isn’t a confusion between draft-ietf-ondemand-mobility and draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility. ·Draft-ietf-ondemand-mobility defines the ability of the network to provide different types of session continuity services and extends the Socket interface to enabl

Re: [DMM] 答复: WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring-02

+1. I have one comment/concern however: In section 3.1, there is a reference to I-D.ietf-dmm-deployment-models and to I-D.sijeon-dmm-deployment-models. I don't think it is reasonable thT DMM should have two drafts describing deployment models and expect these drafts to be merged at some point of

Re: [DMM] On demand mobility and "Use Cases and API Extension for Source IP Address Selection"

Hi, Since I was not in the room while this was discussed, I would like to understand the following: Has draft-sijeon-dmm-use-cases-api-source been discussed and accepted by the WG and the merged document will resume post-WGLC process, or will we have to present the merged document for review by

[DMM] Slides for the DHCPv6 extensions item

Hi Jouni and Dapeng, Attached the presentation for the DHCPv6 extensions item in the DMM session. Regards, Danny - A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential mat

Re: [DMM] DMM agenda requests

Hi, I would like a 5 minute slot to mention the last update on the draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility-04 I-D and ask for adoption. Thanks, Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of jouni.nospam Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 07:49 To: dmm@ietf.or

[DMM] New version of draft-moses-dhcp-ondemand-mobility

Hi all, Several days ago I uploaded a new version of draft-moses-dhcp-ondemand-mobility. This version includes a fix to the IP-Prefix definition according to rfc7227 as directed by Suresh, and some other editorial changes including the new definition for the three IP-continuity services as def

Re: [DMM] The DMM WG has placed draft-wt-dmm-deployment-models in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

I support the WG adoption of this draft. Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 07:12 To: draft-wt-dmm-deployment-mod...@ietf.org; dmm-cha...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] The DMM WG has placed dra

Re: [DMM] The DMM WG has placed draft-chan-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchoring in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

I support the WG adoption if this draft. Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 07:12 To: dmm-cha...@ietf.org; draft-chan-dmm-distributed-mobility-anchor...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] The DMM W

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-01

I support version 02. Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 07:09 To: dmm@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihom...@ietf.org Cc: "刘大鹏(鹏成)" Subject: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-01 Folks, As said

Re: [DMM] Slides/material for the prez slots

Attached slides for the OnDemand topic. -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 01:58 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] Slides/material for the prez slots Folks, Those of you who are on the agenda, please, send your

Re: [DMM] New version of the OnDemand Mobility draft

Hi Alex, Thanks for the support. I will issue a new version shortly. Regards, /Danny -Original Message- From: Alexandre Petrescu [mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 17:49 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm@ietf.org; jouni.nos...@gmail.com; Seil Jeon Subject

Re: [DMM] New version of the OnDemand Mobility draft

change addresses your concerns? Thanks, /Danny -Original Message- From: Alexandre Petrescu [mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 09:41 To: jouni.nos...@gmail.com; Seil Jeon Cc: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] New version of the O

[DMM] New version of the OnDemand Mobility draft

Hi, I have posted a new version of the OnDemand Mobility draft: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-06. This new version includes some text editing according to the comments from Seil and change of classification from the Standard

Re: [DMM] IETF96 meeting - call for agenda items; was RE: IETF96 meeting - first call for agenda items

Hi, I would like a 10 minute slot to give an update on the OnDemand effort. Thanks, /Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 17:47 To: dmm@ietf.org Cc: 成 鹏 Subject: [DMM] IETF96 meeting - call for ag

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05

Isn't the text clear enough without this addition. Let me think about this a little more. Thanks, /Danny From: Seil Jeon [mailto:seilj...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2016 11:21 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mob

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05

From: Seil Jeon [mailto:seilj...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 13:33 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05 Hi Danny, Thanks for your revision. I mostly agree with your texts. But I put my small revision on your texts. Fo

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-05

Hi, Thanks for the support. I agree with your comment; the text might be misleading. The general principle is to maintain the old behavior (prior to OnDemand support) when one entity is legacy. According to this principle, if a legacy application is executed, it should experience the same beha

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Hi, As with the previous WGLC for this draft, I support this draft. Regards, /Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 20:14 To: dmm@ietf.org; Jouni; 成 鹏 Subject: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma

Re: [DMM] OnDemand draft: 3 address types discussion

Hi, My newest answers are marked: Danny>>3 Regards, /Danny -Original Message- From: Alexandre Petrescu [mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 11:33 To: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] OnDemand draft: 3 address types disc

Re: [DMM] OnDemand draft: 3 address types discussion

Hi Alex, My replies in this email are marked with 'Danny >>2'. Regards, /Danny -Original Message- From: Alexandre Petrescu [mailto:alexandre.petre...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 16:33 To: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] OnDemand draft:

Re: [DMM] OnDemand draft: 3 address types discussion

Hi Alex, Thank you very much for the detailed review and comments. I have tried to answer them, but if I was not able to be clear enough, I will be happy to discuss this with you. I am removing parts of the previous exchange so that everyone can find the open questions and answers more easily

Re: [DMM] OnDemand draft: 3 address types discussion

Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 22:21 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] OnDemand draft: 3 address types discussion Hi Danny, This is my reply to all your mails. I hope it clarifies the air. I read RFC 5014 and I think that on-demand mobility as I and it seems like as 3GPP understan

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

this communication, we will add reference to the OnDemand draft (hopefully it will become and RFC) to indicate how applications can specify the required type of the source IP address. Regards, Alper and Danny -Original Message- From: Moses, Danny Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 20:40 To

[DMM] Reachable vs Resolvable

Charlie suggested to refer to Reachable IP addresses as Resolvable IP addresses. This is in the introduction section of the draft that defines IP session continuity and IP address reachability. This is also something we evaluated and decided not to change the text. We believe that the term Reso

[DMM] How to detect the ending of an IP session

Behcet indicated that the draft does not define how the ending of an IP session is detected and stated that one cannot define a Sustained IP address type without defining how to detect the ending of an IP session. Well, we do not think that a draft that extends the Socket interface should defin

[DMM] OnDemand draft: 3 address types discussion

This is in reply to comments we received from Behcet and Suresh regarding the three types of addresses define in the draft. Suresh commented that the 'Fixed IP address' is not necessary and application only require to select Sustained or Nomadic IP addresses and Behcet commented that the 'Susta

[DMM] A new version of the On-Demand draft

Hi all, We thank everyone that provided comments and suggestions for improving the OnDemand draft. We have made some changes to the draft addressing some of the comments. The main changes were to improve the description of the three different source IP address types and improving their names. W

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

Hi guys, Alper and I are in the process of compiling all the new comments we received in the last DMM face to face. We plan to issue a new version of the draft that, hopefully, clarifies the definitions and will provide a written response on the mailing list with further explanation and respons

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

examples because they are not RFCs (yet...). Danny -Original Message- From: pierrick.se...@orange.com [mailto:pierrick.se...@orange.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 05:43 To: Moses, Danny; sarik...@ieee.org Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

Hi, Good, see my reply inline (surrounded by >>>>>>>>>>>>) . Thanks again for investing the time to review the drafts, /Danny -Original Message- From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 12:12 To: M

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

Hi Behcet, Please see my new answers marked with DM>> Thanks, /Danny -Original Message- From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 09:22 To: Moses, Danny Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobil

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

Hi Behcet, Please see my reply in the text. Thanks, /Danny -Original Message- From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 22:00 To: Dave Dolson Cc: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

n it. Regards, /Danny -Original Message- From: Newton, Mathew Mr [mailto:mathew.newton...@mod.uk] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 17:30 To: Dave Dolson; Moses, Danny Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 A recent, and hitherto silent, lurker h

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

:ddol...@sandvine.com] Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 04:06 To: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 >From an application developer's point of view, I don't think there should be a >distinction about roaming between provi

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

anny -Original Message- From: Dave Dolson [mailto:ddol...@sandvine.com] Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 22:46 To: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 Danny and Alper, Thanks. I hope your helpful explanations below make it into the

Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

Hi Dave, Sorry for the very late response. Somehow we missed the original email and were reminded by Jouni (Thanks Jouni). Anyway, thank you for the thorough and helpful comments. We have produced a new version and will publish it shortly. Please see further details to your comments: Dave> 1.

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi, I support the adoption of this draft. Regards, /Danny - A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intend

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params

Hi, I support the adoption of this draft. Regards, /Danny - A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipie

Re: [DMM] IETF94 DMM meeting logistics

Hi, This is the slides for the WT1 report. Regards, /Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 19:54 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] IETF94 DMM meeting logistics Folks, Our WG meeting is on Tues

Re: [DMM] mobility and link state [- re: prefix cost]

each topic is useful, and although have some commonalities, should be separate work due to the level of awareness they require from application developers. /Danny From: Dave Dolson [mailto:ddol...@sandvine.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 21:31 To: John Kaippallimalil; Moses, Danny Cc:

Re: [DMM] mobility and link state

not requiring all future applications to be mobility-aware. We are offering means for applications to be mobility aware on their choice to enable them to behave in a more optimal manner in mobile platforms. /Danny From: Dave Dolson [mailto:ddol...@sandvine.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 02:52

[DMM] New revision of the draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility I-D

Hi, We have uploaded a new revision of the draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility I-D. This revision includes the following: 1. Support for requesting a specific type for an IPv6 prefix as well as an IPv6 address 2. Add a new DHCPv6 option for a client to request a specific prefix (e

Re: [DMM] IETF93 meeting.. and forming the agenda

Hi, I would like a 20 minute slot to discuss the DHCP on-demand draft. Thanks, /Danny -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 23:43 To: dmm@ietf.org; 成 鹏 Subject: Re: [DMM] IETF93 meeting.. and forming the

Re: [DMM] question on 'draft-moses-dmm-dhcp-ondemand-mobility'

Hi, Can you please provide text that describes the use-case and the proposed technical modifications/additions to support the use-case? Thanks, /Danny From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:fred.l.temp...@boeing.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 01:36 To: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] 回复： Answer on raised questions for the proposed API

Again – what exactly are you comparing? Please be more specific. From: Dapeng Liu [mailto:maxpass...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 16:28 To: Moses, Danny Cc: Seil Jeon; dmm@ietf.org Subject: 回复： [DMM] Answer on raised questions for the proposed API 在 2015年4月13日 星期一，下午9:21，Moses

Re: [DMM] 回复： Answer on raised questions for the proposed API

What is simpler. Can you be more specific? What are you comparing? Thanks, /Danny From: Dapeng Liu [mailto:maxpass...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 15:54 To: Seil Jeon Cc: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org Subject: 回复： [DMM] Answer on raised questions for the proposed API

  1   2   >