Hello Kalyani,
> [..snip..]
> If you mean SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft, it is already a WG document, not my
> draft. So I’d collect opinions on this from WG. I’m sorry for that.
> As a co-author of the draft, I’m afraid I disagree. SRv6 Mobile Uplane draft
> specifies SRv6 functions for mobile
iew comments on ]
draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt
Hello Kalyani,
>
> When you see UPF specifically it should be controlled by SMF through N4, they
> are not the UPFs.
> But you might see them as UPFs if a SMF doesn’t control them directly but the
> SMF can put the sessio
Hello Kalyani,
>
> When you see UPF specifically it should be controlled by SMF through N4, they
> are not the UPFs.
> But you might see them as UPFs if a SMF doesn’t control them directly but the
> SMF can put the sessions to it through some other means.
> 3GPP SA2 has studied on that case
Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: review comments on ]
draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt
[Snip..]
When it comes to service function type UPF, you name it. Following draft
exhibits how service chain can be done by SRv6:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-chaining-00
[Uma
g; dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: review comments on ]
draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-00.txt
Hello Kalyani,
> [..snip..]
> Your slides 9 – 13 show interactions between UPFs and SMF. There are 2 kinds
> of UPFs:
> Anchor type UPF and service
