On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Satoru Matsushima
wrote:
> Dear Sridhar,
>
> It’s nice to see you in DMM list as well. :-)
>
>> [...snip...]
>
>
>> 1. Section 5.2.2 of the draft says,
>>
>> UPF2_in : (Z,A) -> UPF2 maps the flow w/
>>
Satoru,
Thanks for the responses.
In the Enhanced mode - section 5.2, it is still not clear (if or) how multiple
UPFs on path would be programmed.
23.501, 5.6.4 discusses about a single PDU session with multiple PDU Session
anchors.
What would the SR path look like: gNB --> UPF1 --> UPF2 (2 s
Hello Tom,
Thank you for your feedback.
> ...snip...
> - Pick a handful of representative formats, maybe something like five,
> and do an an equivalent comparison. For instance, it should be easy to
> deduce the equivalent packet formats for traditional mode in SR that
> are needed for GTP and I
> 2. For traditional mode (basic mode), could you please elaborate on the MTU
> overhead being less than GTPU? GTPU encap MTU overhead = 20 octets outer IPv4
> header + 8 octets UDP header + 12 octets GTPU header + Extension header for
> QFI. SRv6 encap MTU overhead = 40 octets IPv6 header + EH
