[DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS)

2017-02-10 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https

[DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with COMMENT)

2017-02-16 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-07-29 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind
Hi Danny, Sorry for my super late reply! Somehow your mail got sorted in the wrong folder and I therefore overlooked it. Did you have a chance to talk more about this with other reviewers or other people in the working group? I still think that it is not appropriate nor very useful to have the

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-08-01 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind
; published. > Please consider the new version that I have posted: > https://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18.pdf > > Best regards, > > Danny > > -Original Message- > From: Mirja Kuehlewind [mailto:i...@kuehlewind.net] > Sent: Monday, Jul

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-18: (with COMMENT)

2019-08-02 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind
Hi Moses, First this was only a comment from my side and not a discuss point. So it would be good if you can double-check the wording but there is probably not more to do. However, let me give some more background on my point. There are also mobility solutions in the transport layer. QUIC can

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04: (with DISCUSS)

2017-02-11 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Hi Suresh, sounds all good! I’m happy to quickly resolve my discuss if the authors agree! Mirja > Am 11.02.2017 um 05:05 schrieb Suresh Krishnan : > > HI Mirja, > >> On Feb 10, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: >> >> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the

Re: [DMM] Mirja_Kühlewind's_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06:_(with_COMMENT)

2017-03-06 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Hi, both changes look good to me. Mirja > Am 06.03.2017 um 03:13 schrieb Z.W. Yan : > > Hello, Mirja, > Thank you for the review and comments on this draft, please check my in-line > responses below. > > > 2017-03-06 > Z.W. Yan > 发件人: Mirja_Kühlewind > 发送时间: 2017-03-01 02:08:21 > 收件人:

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2017-08-17 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Hi Sri, see below. > Am 17.08.2017 um 05:17 schrieb Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) : > > Hi Mirja. > > Please see below and also let us know if the text that we discussed with > Warren addresses your main concerns. > > > Regards > Sri > > > On 7/31/17, 2:49 PM, "Mirja Kühlewind" wrote: > >> Mi

Re: [DMM] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmm-mag-multihoming-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2017-08-18 Thread Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
Thanks! Will wait for the next version! > Am 18.08.2017 um 03:08 schrieb Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) : > > Hi Mirja, > > Thank you for your quick feedback. Please see inline … > > > > On 8/17/17, 6:12 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" wrote: