On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:16:01 +0200
poitr pogo wrote:
> I agree.
> In perfect world of knowlegable programmers writing software that
> works there is no need for supervisors.
>
> One can handle errors or leave this for supervisor.
>
> For me supervisor will always be a tool
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:17:52 -0400
Rob Owens wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Steve Litt
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Does OpenRC do the conditional starts?
>
>
> Yes, it does. See "The depend function" here:
>
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Steve Litt
wrote:
>
> Does OpenRC do the conditional starts?
Yes, it does. See "The depend function" here:
http://www.funtoo.org/Package:OpenRC
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
I agree.
In perfect world of knowlegable programmers writing software that works
there is no need for supervisors.
One can handle errors or leave this for supervisor.
For me supervisor will always be a tool of a helpless admin.
Regards
piotr
___
Dng
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:52:45PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[cut]
> >
> > But I am sure that 99.% of the users do not need supervisors in
> > 99.% of the cases...
>
> I wouldn't say 99.%. I think everyone running wpa_supplicant can
> benefit from having it respawnable, because it
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:22:25 +0100
KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:51:43PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > Nobody supervises pid1, OK? So why would the supervisor need to
> > be supervised? It is supposed to be rock solid. Note that it can be
> >
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:51:43 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 16/09/2016 13:15, KatolaZ a écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >
> > [cut]
> >
> >> Steve,
> >>
> >> I like more and more this idea of separating the tasks:
> >> -
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:24:45 +0200
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I like more and more this idea of separating the tasks:
> - pid1 (sysvinit or whatever) performs one-shot startups and
> basic supervision (like for getty),
sysvinit, right? Spawn your gettys and
> On September 16, 2016 at 9:51 AM Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> Le 16/09/2016 13:15, KatolaZ a écrit :
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >
> > [cut]
> >
> >> Steve,
> >>
> >> I like more and more this idea of separating the tasks:
> >> -
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:16:03PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[cut]
>
> Hi KatolaZ,
>
> The preceding paragraph represents a philosophy more than anything
> else. It's the philosophy that your computer must never, ever, for any
> reason ever become unresponsive. You share that philosophy with
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:15:01 +0100
KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > Steve,
> >
> > I like more and more this idea of separating the tasks:
> > - pid1 (sysvinit or whatever) performs one-shot
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:51:43PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
[cut]
> Nobody supervises pid1, OK? So why would the supervisor need to be
> supervised? It is supposed to be rock solid. Note that it can be barely
> relaunched by sysvinit in the same way as getty.
>
Yep, but if a supervisor
Le 16/09/2016 13:15, KatolaZ a écrit :
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
[cut]
Steve,
I like more and more this idea of separating the tasks:
- pid1 (sysvinit or whatever) performs one-shot startups and basic
supervision (like for getty),
-
Am Freitag, 16. September 2016 schrieb KatolaZ:
> That looks like a great plan, but who will supervise the supervisors?
> :)
The NSA .. or BND ... . If you don't have something to hide, then you have
nothing to fear ;-)
--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
[cut]
>
> Steve,
>
> I like more and more this idea of separating the tasks:
> - pid1 (sysvinit or whatever) performs one-shot startups and basic
> supervision (like for getty),
> - services needing a sophisticated
Le 16/09/2016 12:02, Steve Litt a écrit :
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:31:28 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
Am Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:31:54 +
schrieb Jaromil :
not at all. We even plan to roll out our own openrc package,
ditching the one
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 12:31:28 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
> emnin...@riseup.net wrote:
> > Am Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:31:54 +
> > schrieb Jaromil :
> >
> > > not at all. We even plan to roll out our own openrc package,
> > > ditching the one from Debian which has
17 matches
Mail list logo