I've been having issues upgrading a standard Devuan Jessie install to
Ascii. During upgrade, the task-xfce4-desktop package gets uninstalled and
can't be installed afterwards due to dependency problems.
Jessie has tasksel=3.33+devuan1.0 and Ascii has tasksel=3.33+devuan0.3
which is preventing
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:59:45PM +0200, Massimiliano Baldinelli wrote:
[cut]
>
> I booted today with the updated dbus (1.10.18-1+devuan2.2) and all is
> working until now.
>
> Desktop is MATE 1.16.2, no login manager as I still use startx.
>
> I also made a (very quick) test on a VM with
Yes I agree it would be nice.
I don't go through all the outer pages though. Usually just google "debian
slim package" and go straight to the page
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/x11/slim
ozi
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Hendrik Boom
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 06:46:24PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
>
> And sometimes I do want to know what packages are in ascii or ceres
> instead of the jessie that's specified in my sources.list file.
>
> Is it difficult to convert the packages.debian.org software that Deban
> uses? Or
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:16:45PM -0400, fsmithred wrote:
> On 06/13/2017 11:01 AM, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> > On 2017-06-13 06:59, aitor wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> On 06/12/2017 12:00 PM, Jaromil wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >>>
> Debian has a
On 06/14/2017 09:06 AM, KatolaZ wrote:
Hi Max,
kernel version could be irrelevant, but which desktop manager you are
using should not be so.
I booted today with the updated dbus (1.10.18-1+devuan2.2) and all is
working until now.
Desktop is MATE 1.16.2, no login manager as I still use
On 06/13/2017 11:01 AM, goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> On 2017-06-13 06:59, aitor wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On 06/12/2017 12:00 PM, Jaromil wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2017, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>>>
Debian has a useful page, https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
[1],
which
On 13/06/2017 02:39 μμ, KatolaZ wrote:
It would be great if somebody (better if "many-body" :P) could confirm
whether an upgrade from the current ascii version to those packages is
flawless or not.
Upgrade works without problems here (ASCII, kde, lightdm) :)
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Massimiliano Baldinelli wrote:
> On 2017-06-13 11:39, KatolaZ wrote:
>
> >It would be great if somebody (better if "many-body" :P) could confirm
> >whether an upgrade from the current ascii version to those packages is
> >flawless or not.
>
> Ciao