Le 24/11/2018 à 22:41, Adam Borowski a écrit :
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 02:40:31PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 06:47:42PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
In my last install, I still had /tmp and /var on separate
partitions,
but I'm questionning the validity of such a
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:18:53 -0600
Dan Pridgeon wrote:
> I look forward to your "detailed
> instructions" around this issue. (Though retired out of the computer
> test environment, I'm very much a newbie when it comes to the
> collaborative development via the Internet environment.) I'm
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 22:47:51 +0100
Harald Arnesen wrote:
> Could you have /boot on a USB stick that you carry with you when not
> at the computer?
Oh my, this is an elegant solution!
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On 24.11.18 22:41, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 02:40:31PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 06:47:42PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
> > >
> > > In my last install, I still had /tmp and /var on separate partitions,
> > > but I'm questionning the validity of
spiralofhope [24.11.2018 22:17]:
>> Drive encryption has advantages in terms of keeping secrets and
>> foiling the evil-maid scenario.
> I always thought an evil maid could fiddle with the bootloader/etc or
> root to wholly compromise the system somewhat easily, and then it's
> just a matter of
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 02:40:31PM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 06:47:42PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >
> > In my last install, I still had /tmp and /var on separate partitions,
> > but I'm questionning the validity of such a setup.
>
> It's useful to have /tmp on a
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:45:56 -0500
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Drive encryption has advantages in terms of keeping secrets and
> foiling the evil-maid scenario.
I always thought an evil maid could fiddle with the bootloader/etc or
root to wholly compromise the system somewhat easily, and then it's
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 06:21:01PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> It would be possible to share the ports tree on a FreeBSD system, since it's
> mostly self-contained, so long as it's read-only (it has unshared data in
> /var including the package database, so can't be read-write). But this is
>
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 03:14:10PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are a million different ways to set up your computer. Preserving
> those choices is why we use Linux instead of windoz and mac. In a
> recent thread people have expressed love or disdain for various setups.
>
> Let
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 06:47:42PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> In my last install, I still had /tmp and /var on separate partitions,
> but I'm questionning the validity of such a setup.
It's useful to have /tmp on a separate partition in case some process
running amok fills it and
I would appreciate advice on the following situation
I have several hosts of differing architectures or peripherals in a
training room (several training rooms actually but each are independent
of each other) which are supported by a server running the standard *NIX
network services DHCP, BIND
On 11/24/18 11:36 AM, spiralofhope wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:14:10 -0500
Steve Litt wrote:
I don't yet run drive encryption, but may start.
I encourage it. It's straightforward, and was surprisingly good
performance for me, even on rust.
I did it from scratch, prepping a whole drive
Le 24/11/2018 à 13:13, Roger Leigh a écrit :
(Like many, I used to routinely use a separate /usr on a separate
partition, then LVM LV, until I really looked at the practice and
questioned the real underlying problems which it was solving. I've not
needed one in over a decade at this point.
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:14:10 -0500
Steve Litt wrote:
> I don't yet run drive encryption, but may start.
I encourage it. It's straightforward, and was surprisingly good
performance for me, even on rust.
I did it from scratch, prepping a whole drive and then copying data from
elsewhere, and
---
This is a bike shed topic for me. Incoming bullshittery. :)
---
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 12:15:39 +0100
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Now
> what happens if I let go any belief that some of them are true or
> right, preferably my own, and some of them are false or wrong,
> preferably those of
Roger,
I appreciate you taking the time for the explanation of the flow of
logic driving the developments.
It adds some depth that the average user, like me is not normally
exposed to.
I remember doing installations with various partitions for directories,
as much for coolness as anything,
Roger:
...
> There's no clean separation between the "base" system and "everything else".
...
I think my urge to have a separate /usr is that I want such a
separation and there isn't a clear other place to have it.
> The other part of the scenario you mentioned here is "doesn't want to
> use
On 24/11/2018 02:45, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:17:21 +
Roger Leigh wrote:
Some general points to consider:
1) A separate /usr serves no practical purpose on a Debian/Devuan
system
Historically, /usr was separately mountable, shareable over NFS.
With a package
Dear readers,
After all what I let go and what I learned in the process of doing so, I
totally agree with had I heard during some recordings I used. There are
two essential aspects for any relationship: Mutuality and harmlessness.
In the current discussions on this list I have seen a great
19 matches
Mail list logo
