On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 06:25:02PM +, NCW RC via Dng wrote:
> I hope I did this maillist reply correctly. I am doing it with webmail, not
> an email client.
>
> > libpam-systemd depends systemd-sysv. libpam-systemd also depends
> > systemd. Devuan's libpam-elogind provides libpam-systemd
Dear Dev1ers,
I am using Ascii very satisfactorily and do not want, for the time
being anyway, to migrate to a newer system. But I would need to use a
higher version of Audacity, not 2.1 any longer but rather 2.2 (or even
2.3) if possible. Is there anything in Devuan like the backports
On 06/09/19 at 15:23, fsmithred via Dng wrote:
> In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on
> libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.)
>
> The version of udisks2 in beowulf is very old compared to what's in
> buster.
Really? I'm on beowulf now, and I have:
ii udisks2
I hope I did this maillist reply correctly. I am doing it with webmail, not an
email client.
> libpam-systemd depends systemd-sysv. libpam-systemd also depends
> systemd. Devuan's libpam-elogind provides libpam-systemd but conflicts with
> systemd which must be removed first.
>
> However, to
On 9/7/19 1:33 PM, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
- Original Message - From: "fsmithred via Dng"
To: "dng"
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM
Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on
libpam-systemd (and
- Original Message -
From: "fsmithred via Dng"
To: "dng"
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2019 9:23 AM
Subject: [DNG] udisks2 - who uses it? (not a poll)
In ascii, udisks2 has been devuanized to remove a dependency on
libpam-systemd (and maybe libsystemd0, too.)
The version of udisks2
On 9/7/19 2:26 AM, Mark Hindley wrote:
libpam-systemd depends systemd-sysv. libpam-systemd also depends
systemd. Devuan's libpam-elogind provides libpam-systemd but conflicts with
systemd which must be removed first.
However, to get systemd uninstalled we first have to replace systemd-sysv with
On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 11:04:00AM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> On 07/09/19 07:30, Mark Hindley wrote:
> But it should use libpam-elogind. Perhaps we need to ban libpam-systemd
> to force the use of libpam-elogind instead. The only thing is we need
> to check if their is a dep version check on
