Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-06-07 Thread Simon Walter
On 5/26/21 5:23 PM, Mark Hindley wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:23:56PM +0900, Simon Walter wrote: On 5/26/21 12:37 AM, Mark Hindley wrote: This is actually a Debian bug and should be fixed there. If cockpit requires systemd, is should declare that dependency. AFAICT, it requires a

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-26 Thread Simon Walter
On 5/26/21 12:53 AM, Rowland penny via Dng wrote: Why would you want to remove something that works ? It just needs an init script. I've been shown by Rowland that a lot of it does work without systemd and, yes, an init script is needed, which I've submitted upstream, thanks to Rowland.

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-26 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen via Dng
Hi Mark (and everyone else on the list!), Mark Hindley writes: > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 07:03:16PM +, g4sra via Dng wrote: >> Is this the rule for all packages that have dependency on SystemD for some >> functionality ? > > My personal opinion on this is yes. Add mine! > Non systemd init

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-26 Thread Mark Hindley
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:23:56PM +0900, Simon Walter wrote: > On 5/26/21 12:37 AM, Mark Hindley wrote: > > This is actually a Debian bug and should be fixed there. > > > > If cockpit requires systemd, is should declare that dependency. > > AFAICT, it requires a systemd socket. It doesn't

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-26 Thread Simon Walter
On 5/26/21 12:37 AM, Mark Hindley wrote: This is actually a Debian bug and should be fixed there. If cockpit requires systemd, is should declare that dependency. AFAICT, it requires a systemd socket. It doesn't require any systemd packages (debs). Would that still be considered a dependency

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-26 Thread Simon Walter
On 5/26/21 1:25 AM, Rowland penny via Dng wrote: On 25/05/2021 17:09, Tomasz Torcz wrote: ...    Have you seen Cockpit working on Devuan system? Yes, I had it running on my old Samba AD DC's and I now have it running on a Devuan Unix domain member on my way to installing the Samba AD DC

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread Mark Hindley
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 07:03:16PM +, g4sra via Dng wrote: > Is this the rule for all packages that have dependency on SystemD for some > functionality ? My personal opinion on this is yes. Non systemd init is still possible in Debian. So it appears some current versions of cockpit will not

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread g4sra via Dng
Thanks for chirping in Mark. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 4:37 PM, Mark Hindley wrote: > This is actually a Debian bug and should be fixed there. > > If cockpit requires systemd, is should declare that dependency. > > If the dependency were present, amprolla

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread Rowland penny via Dng
On 25/05/2021 17:09, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Dnia Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:53:29PM +0100, Rowland penny via Dng napisał(a): After installing it on an fresh Beowulf installation, it does not run and to my knowledge will never be able to w/o systemd sockets. IIRC, the policy is not to remove anything

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread Tomasz Torcz
Dnia Tue, May 25, 2021 at 04:53:29PM +0100, Rowland penny via Dng napisał(a): > > After installing it on an fresh Beowulf installation, it does not run > > and to my knowledge will never be able to w/o systemd sockets. > > > > IIRC, the policy is not to remove anything related, but use stubs and

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread Rowland penny via Dng
On 25/05/2021 05:42, Simon Walter wrote: Hi all, I wanted to see if Cockpit would by some unknown magic run on Devuan. The reason I wanted to do this is because the packages are available in the default repos. After installing it on an fresh Beowulf installation, it does not run and to my

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread Mark Hindley
This is actually a Debian bug and should be fixed there. If cockpit requires systemd, is should declare that dependency. If the dependency were present, amprolla would exclude cockpit from the Devuan archives. So I suggest you submit a bug to Debian's BTS asking for the explicit systemd

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread d...@d404.nl
On 25-05-2021 17:22, g4sra via Dng wrote: > <--snip--> > >>> I sympathise, but am not sure this would (currently) be the best use of >>> resources. >>> There is an ever growing list of packaged applications that do not function >>> without SystemD. >>> If every one were identified, then removal

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread g4sra via Dng
<--snip--> > > I sympathise, but am not sure this would (currently) be the best use of > > resources. > > There is an ever growing list of packaged applications that do not function > > without SystemD. > > If every one were identified, then removal of all from the repos may be > > justified.

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 11:45:49AM +, g4sra via Dng wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 5:42 AM, Simon Walter wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > I wanted to see if Cockpit would by some unknown magic run on Devuan. > > The reason I wanted to do this is because

Re: [DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-25 Thread g4sra via Dng
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 5:42 AM, Simon Walter wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to see if Cockpit would by some unknown magic run on Devuan. > The reason I wanted to do this is because the packages are available in > the default repos. > > After installing it on

[DNG] Cockpit removal might make sense

2021-05-24 Thread Simon Walter
Hi all, I wanted to see if Cockpit would by some unknown magic run on Devuan. The reason I wanted to do this is because the packages are available in the default repos. After installing it on an fresh Beowulf installation, it does not run and to my knowledge will never be able to w/o