Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

Le 23/08/2016 09:02, KatolaZ a écrit : I wouldn't be too much concerned about Internet polls. In particular, a scientifically sound poll should ask a single question at a time, and not mix four questions like in this case: - Have you tried Devuan? - If not, do you plan to try it in the future?

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 06:27:58PM +, Go Linux wrote: > Looks like the second poll has ended. There's a new one up today and voting > is no longer an option. Here are the final results: > > Poll results for: The state of Devuan > > I have tried Devuan and it is ready to use: 95 (27%) >

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On 08/20/2016 05:02 AM, Didier Kryn wrote: What can prevent a single person from voting multiple times? I have voted - once only - but I think this kind of poll is, at the minimum, terribly biased. It probably only allows one per IP address per day. So if you are on a dynamically

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

Le 20/08/2016 07:11, Peter Olson a écrit : On August 19, 2016 at 2:25 PM Steve Litt wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:06:24 -0400 fsmithred wrote: For anyone who's interested in the results before they got wiped, I just voted again, "ready to

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:53:18 -0700 > Rick Moen wrote: > > > Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > > > > > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple > > > times because I'm originally

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:53:18 -0700 Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > > > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple > > times because I'm originally from Chicago. > > I was able to vote while eating BBQ because

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

> On August 19, 2016 at 2:25 PM Steve Litt wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:06:24 -0400 > fsmithred wrote: > > > For anyone who's interested in the results before they got wiped, > > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple > times because I'm originally from Chicago. I was able to vote while eating BBQ because I'm visiting Kansas City. ___ Dng mailing

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

Quoting Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl): > What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side? How does that not describe just about every Internet poll, ever? I did, though, rather like what the government of Hungary did about Stephen Colbert fans brigading the Internet

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

What does it mean "little" and "lots" of work? Words like "little"and "lots" are too subjective. Although DEVUAN may be a works in progress, many like me have been using it as their production OS for a whole year. An OS can never be ready. Is MS Windows ready? Does it have outstanding bugs? Is

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Fri, 8/19/16, fsmithred <fsmith...@gmail.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 1:06 PM On 08/19/2016 01:31 PM, Steve Litt wrote: >> On Fri, 19 Aug 2

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:06:24 -0400 fsmithred wrote: > For anyone who's interested in the results before they got wiped, I just voted again, "ready to use" again. I'm able to vote multiple times because I'm originally from Chicago. SteveT Steve Litt August 2016 featured

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On 08/19/2016 01:31 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:55:49 + (UTC) > Go Linux wrote: > >> On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski wrote: > >>> What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side? >>> >> >> What's the point of

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

I chose the second option as it does need a bit more work WRT Network Manager a few small nits. I'm confident these will be completed soon. - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:55:49 + (UTC) Go Linux wrote: > On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski wrote: > > What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side? > > > > What's the point of any poll or election? I imagine that would > depend

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:55:49PM +, Go Linux wrote: > On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over > To: dng@lists.dyne.org > Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 2:13 AM > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 2:13 AM On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:21:24AM +, Go Linux wrote: >> The Distrowatch poll posted by Jim Murphy a

Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:21:24AM +, Go Linux wrote: > The Distrowatch poll posted by Jim Murphy a few days ago - > https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20160816.141551.cded4448.en.html - went > sideways this morning. It was archived with results from another unrelated > poll. I emailed

[DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over

The Distrowatch poll posted by Jim Murphy a few days ago - https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20160816.141551.cded4448.en.html - went sideways this morning. It was archived with results from another unrelated poll. I emailed to let them know and suddenly the odometer was back to zero and