Hi:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:42:37PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> >... why not use waterfox instead of firefox or palemoon?
>
> It doesn't run on my laptop. Grumbles that a library is missing:
>
> laptop3:~/waterfox/waterfox$ >>> ./waterfox
> ./waterfox:
Hi there,
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, zap wrote:
I have largely stayed quiet about this topic,
No need to be shy. :)
... why not use waterfox instead of firefox or palemoon?
It doesn't run on my laptop. Grumbles that a library is missing:
laptop3:~/waterfox/waterfox$ >>> ./waterfox
./waterfox:
I have largely stayed quiet about this topic, but why not use waterfox
instead of firefox or palemoon?
He makes good changes to it removing a lot of unneeded crap. Although,
eme is still an option, most of the junk is removed. That's my thoughts
on this though. and that's easy to disable. :)
On 170706-13:13+0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Ooops. Sorry about the previous subject line, finger slipped.
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
>
> > ... I'm currently without a GUI browser, because of:
> > Building Pale Moon on Devuan fails - Pale Moon forum
> >
