Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> The syntax isn't "stub zone", it's "local zone". They use the "stub
> zone" syntax for something else. Thank you for turning me on to Unbound
> --- it's twice as easy as Bind9 and djbdns.
You're very welcome. I quote below (in part) the
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 17:34:37 -0700
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
>
> > I've found the way for Unbound itself to do simple on-subnet auth
> > without a separate auth server, and will reveal them tomorrow.
>
> That is doubtless the 'stub zone' functionality
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> I've found the way for Unbound itself to do simple on-subnet auth
> without a separate auth server, and will reveal them tomorrow.
That is doubtless the 'stub zone' functionality I mentioned in
I've found the way for Unbound itself to do simple on-subnet auth
without a separate auth server, and will reveal them tomorrow.
Thanks.
SteveT
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 21:22:40 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:27:25 -0700
> Rick Moen wrote:
>
>
> > Most highly rated comment:
> >
Quoting Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI (ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org):
> Sadly, Debian and Devuan have nothing that compares with the Drak* tools.
Standards of what are desirable tools for system administration,
They Do Differ[tm].
On that foundation (diversity of opinions) we derive horse racing,
Quoting Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI (ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org):
> If you are looking for a distro with easy-to-use GUI interface, and
> without systemd, you might consider PCLinuxOS, and its suite of Drak*
> configuration apps inherited from Mandrake / Mandriva / Mageia.
Or one can use Devuan.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 22:04:36 +0100
Simon Hobson wrote:
> Ouch - like I said, the message is clear that they don't want to support and
> promote it. Given that one of the main reasons for people to run OS X Server
> is for the "easy to use GUI", I'd say that it pretty well removes most of the
Quoting wirelessd...@gmail.com (wirelessd...@gmail.com):
> I'm not much of a BIND9 expert, so I'll happily try out something else
> if it's considered to be more secure.
I concur with Steve's comments about the desirability of separating
recursive service from authoritative service -- and I
Quoting wirelessd...@gmail.com (wirelessd...@gmail.com):
> I want to switch from macOS Server to unbound for a local LAN DNS as
> its DNS features will be deprecated soon, but my reading tells me that
> unbound only acts as a recursive nameserver, not authoritative.
>
> What’s the general
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> So it's been about 2 weeks I've been using unbound, and subjectively,
> my web browsing has slowed, compared to the straight 8.8.8.8 and
> 8.8.4.4 I used before. Sometimes the browser's status bar says
> "resolving" during those delays, and
wirelessd...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Most of the services are disappearing from the macOS Server app,
>> making it almost useless for a home server environment.
>> https://support.apple.com/en-au/HT208312
Ouch - like I said, the message is clear that they don't want to support and
promote it. Given
Forgetting to hit reply-all :D
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 13:20, wrote:
>
> > I haven't been following OSX Server, so they are dropping DNS now ? It's
> > always seemed like the unwanted stepchild, not really promoted or
> > developed, and with no proper server hardware to run it on (I used to
>
Forgetting to hit reply-all :D
On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 13:24, wrote:
>
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2018 at 08:15, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > There are disadvantages to having the same software do both auth and
> > cache, and BIND is a big honkin complexity. See the djbdns
> > documentation for details. I
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:15:49 +0100
Simon Hobson wrote:
> wirelessd...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > What’s the general consensus on a good authoritative server to pair
> > with unbound?
> >
> > I can see both knot and nsd are packaged in devuan, but have no
> > experience with any outside BIND9 and
wirelessd...@gmail.com wrote:
> I want to switch from macOS Server to unbound for a local LAN DNS as its DNS
> features will be deprecated soon, but my reading tells me that unbound only
> acts as a recursive nameserver, not authoritative.
>
> What’s the general consensus on a good
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:27:25 -0700
> Rick Moen wrote:
>
>
>> Most highly rated comment:
>>
>> I run my own local recursive nameservers even on my portable
>> devices. Totally not interested in using anyone's resolvers but my
>> own.
>>
>> Ding!
>>
>> 1. apt-get install unbound
>> 2. sed
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:27:25 -0700
Rick Moen wrote:
> Most highly rated comment:
>
> I run my own local recursive nameservers even on my portable
> devices. Totally not interested in using anyone's resolvers but my
> own.
>
> Ding!
>
> 1. apt-get install unbound
> 2. sed -i
17 matches
Mail list logo
