Re: [DNG] eudev or vdev?

2017-12-06 Thread aitor_czr
Hi, Yevgeny: On 12/05/2017 06:50 AM, Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky wrote: Hello, could someone enlighten me about differences in eudev and vdev packages? I don't know which one to choose :) A version of gnuinos jessie with vdev in action is coming soon, which has been working fine for me during

Re: [DNG] eudev or vdev?

2017-12-05 Thread Ismael L. Donis Garcia
- Original Message - From: "KatolaZ" <kato...@freaknet.org> To: <dng@lists.dyne.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 4:02 AM Subject: Re: [DNG] eudev or vdev? It is not unreasonable to assume that eudev might be the default device manager in ascii, thanks to the w

Re: [DNG] eudev or vdev?

2017-12-05 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 05/12/2017 à 12:02, KatolaZ a écrit : On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:11:36AM +, Olav Selseng Vestreim wrote: [cut] eudev is basically udev, forked by Gentoo from the systemd source tree https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Eudev vdev is a separate device manager, written by Jude Nelson:

Re: [DNG] eudev or vdev?

2017-12-05 Thread KatolaZ
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:11:36AM +, Olav Selseng Vestreim wrote: [cut] > > > > eudev is basically udev, forked by Gentoo from the systemd source tree > > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Eudev > > > > vdev is a separate device manager, written by Jude Nelson: > > > >

Re: [DNG] eudev or vdev?

2017-12-05 Thread Olav Selseng Vestreim
On Tuesday 5. December 2017 09.02.15 KatolaZ wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 01:50:32PM +0800, Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > could someone enlighten me about differences in eudev and vdev packages? > > I don't know which one to choose :) > > eudev is basically udev, forked by

Re: [DNG] eudev or vdev?

2017-12-05 Thread KatolaZ
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 01:50:32PM +0800, Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky wrote: > Hello, > > could someone enlighten me about differences in eudev and vdev packages? > I don't know which one to choose :) > eudev is basically udev, forked by Gentoo from the systemd source tree

[DNG] eudev or vdev?

2017-12-04 Thread Yevgeny Kosarzhevsky
Hello, could someone enlighten me about differences in eudev and vdev packages? I don't know which one to choose :) -- Regards, Yevgeny ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-24 Thread Go Linux
On Wed, 8/24/16, Brad Campbell <lists2...@fnarfbargle.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev] To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2016, 1:55 AM > On 24/08/16 13:57, Steve Litt wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-24 Thread Brad Campbell
On 24/08/16 13:57, Steve Litt wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:37:53 +0800 Brad Campbell wrote: On 24/08/16 11:13, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:47:41 -0400 Clarke Sideroad wrote: I think kdbus is dead due to the bad press, but

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-24 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 24/08/2016 01:29, Adam Borowski a écrit : [~/linux]$ git fetch linus remote: Counting objects: 795, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (481/481), done. remote: Total 795 (delta 477), reused 517 (delta 311) Receiving objects: 100% (795/795), 1.54 MiB | 660.00 KiB/s, done. Resolving

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Steve Litt
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:37:53 +0800 Brad Campbell wrote: > On 24/08/16 11:13, Steve Litt wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:47:41 -0400 > > Clarke Sideroad wrote: > > > >> I think kdbus is dead due to the bad press, but I believe there is >

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Brad Campbell
On 24/08/16 11:13, Steve Litt wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:47:41 -0400 Clarke Sideroad wrote: I think kdbus is dead due to the bad press, but I believe there is bus1 coming along to replace that. https://github.com/bus1/bus1 http://www.bus1.org/ Some familiar

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:47:41 -0400 Clarke Sideroad wrote: > I think kdbus is dead due to the bad press, but I believe there is > bus1 coming along to replace that. > https://github.com/bus1/bus1 > http://www.bus1.org/ > > Some familiar names, but possibly not directly

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 23:01:20 + (UTC) Go Linux wrote: > On Tue, 8/23/16, Steve Litt wrote: > >> I agree that relying on anything connected to udev will likely not > >> be sustainable in the long term. I was reminded of this just > >> today in a

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Clarke Sideroad
I think kdbus is dead due to the bad press, but I believe there is bus1 coming along to replace that. https://github.com/bus1/bus1 http://www.bus1.org/ Some familiar names, but possibly not directly part of systemd Clarke ___ Dng mailing list

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:10:12PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019657.html > > By the way, when did Linux OK kdbus? [~/linux]$ git fetch linus remote: Counting objects: 795, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (481/481), done.

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Go Linux
On Tue, 8/23/16, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev] To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2016, 5:10 PM >> On Sun, 8/21/16, Daniel Reurich <dan...@centurion.net.nz> wrote: >> >> Subject: Re: [DNG]

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Nate Bargmann
Yup, one distribution (he signed with "Red Hat" so was presumably speaking on their behalf) being dictatorial toward the rest. I don't recall that being the foundation the Linux Community was built on when I discovered it 20 years ago. - Nate (Obsolete greybeard) ((But I don't have a beard.))

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-23 Thread Go Linux
On Sun, 8/21/16, Daniel Reurich <dan...@centurion.net.nz> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev] To: dng@lists.dyne.org Date: Sunday, August 21, 2016, 3:08 PM >> >> He guys, >> >> I've been at work for a week or so and today I looked at the DNG list >&

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-22 Thread Ralph Ronnquist
richard lucassen wrote on 23/08/16 05:38: On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:17:11 +1000 Ralph Ronnquist wrote: And with "freedom of choice" in mind: indeed, it would be nice if eudev would be available anyway, whether vdev will be continued or not. As far as I could tell,

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-22 Thread Ralph Ronnquist
richard lucassen wrote on 22/08/16 19:34: ... I agree, but unfortunately nobody has the time and the skills to pick up vdev and to continue its development. I have neither the time, nor the skills unfortunately, otherwise I would certainly have participated in the project. For the moment Devuan

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-22 Thread richard lucassen
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:08:05 +1200 Daniel Reurich wrote: > > I've been at work for a week or so and today I looked at the DNG > > list for the latest activities around vdev, but there has almost > > been no activity on vdev as far as I can see. OTOH, last week I > >

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-21 Thread Daniel Reurich
> > He guys, > > I've been at work for a week or so and today I looked at the DNG list > for the latest activities around vdev, but there has almost been no > activity on vdev as far as I can see. OTOH, last week I tested eudev on > a separate partition and that seems to work quite well. You

Re: [DNG] eudev [was: vdev]

2016-08-21 Thread richard lucassen
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:06:09 -0400 fsmithred wrote: > > ..eudev etc package link? > > These packages were built by David Hare a little over a year ago. They > appear to work on current devuan. I don't know if he plans to update > them. > > add this line to your sources: >