hi Dave and Jim and Teodoro
hope you don't mind I reply your inquiries at once
sup won't ever have a package, so I'm not worried about the namespace
at all. It does not make sense to have a sup package, is really a tool
for distro makers, people preparing containers, online services ran in
a chr
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:29:56PM +0100, Jaromil wrote:
>
> sup is different from doas, because doas is configured at runtime:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/doas.conf.5
> while sup security model is based on the fact it has its settings
> compiled in, so when one p
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Jaromil wrote:
>
> dear devuaneers, suckless hackers and friends of simplicity
>
--- clipped
>
> Basically sup is an hard-coded sudo.
>
> I adopted the software (wrote a mail to pancake, pending response) and
clipped the rest
Hi,
As an FYI: "sup" is not a
Hi,
Cool! Have you considered also to send pull requests
to the site repo or the sup git repository at suckless.org?
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
dear devuaneers, suckless hackers and friends of simplicity
In the past days we are working hard on Devuan, but also on our
dyne.org project Dowse whose prototype is based on an RPi version of
Devuan.
Thinkering on the security model in Dowse and other projects, parazyd
found the 'sup' tool to b
On 17/03/16 17:32, Jim Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Jaromil wrote:
dear devuaneers, suckless hackers and friends of simplicity
--- clipped
Basically sup is an hard-coded sudo.
I adopted the software (wrote a mail to pancake, pending response) and
clipped the rest
Hi
Dave Turner writes:
> On 17/03/16 17:32, Jim Murphy wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Jaromil wrote:
>>> dear devuaneers, suckless hackers and friends of simplicity
>>>
>> --- clipped
>>> Basically sup is an hard-coded sudo.
>>>
>>> I adopted the software (wrote a mail to pancake, pendin
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
> Random suggestion: What about supporting a compiled-in path?
this is a pretty good idea, thanks!
won't be implemented right away as i don't need it immediately myself,
time is so little... but a well written patch would be welcome on this
ciao
_
Jaromil writes:
[...]
> sup is different from doas, because doas is configured at runtime:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi/OpenBSD-current/man5/doas.conf.5
> while sup security model is based on the fact it has its settings
> compiled in, so when one put the binary as suid, one can be s
