2015-11-12 14:44 GMT+01:00, Emiliano Marini :
> Interesting article from Richard Stallman.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html
>
> It starts with:
>
> *"For a software package to be free, all the code in it must be free. But
> not only the
At the end of a day maybe it is a conspiracy?
△
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On 12/11/15 08:44 AM, Emiliano Marini wrote:
Interesting article from Richard Stallman.
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html
It starts with:/
/
/
/
/"For a software package to be free, all the code in it must be free.
But not only the code. Since documentation files
Apologies in advance for digressing, but it honestly amazes me how ignorant
and passive Linus and RMS have been about the whole systemd fiasco since
it's inception. Also, the one person that really astounded me at his
concession to systemd was Shuttleworth. I figured if anyone were going to
On November 12, 2015 4:11:27 PM GMT+01:00, Emiliano Marini
wrote:
>Sadly I must agree with you Linux O'Beardly. Maybe there's much money
>in
>play?
It is not about money. Is about Unity.
Which in general is good to preserve over
non critical diatribes. But they
Sadly I must agree with you Linux O'Beardly. Maybe there's much money in
play?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Linux O'Beardly
wrote:
> Apologies in advance for digressing, but it honestly amazes me how
> ignorant and passive Linus and RMS have been about the whole
Jaromil wrote:
> Of the three perhaps only Linus did, after
> all he is an active programmer and reads
> regularly code. But he is refraining from
> doing universal statements pro or against
> the whole of systemd, while interacting
> on details, which I think is wise to do for