Re: [DNG] Interesting read from RMS

2015-11-12 Thread Teodoro Santoni
2015-11-12 14:44 GMT+01:00, Emiliano Marini : > Interesting article from Richard Stallman. > > https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html > > It starts with: > > *"For a software package to be free, all the code in it must be free. But > not only the

Re: [DNG] Interesting read from RMS

2015-11-12 Thread Mitt Green
At the end of a day maybe it is a conspiracy? △ ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Re: [DNG] Interesting read from RMS

2015-11-12 Thread Clarke Sideroad
On 12/11/15 08:44 AM, Emiliano Marini wrote: Interesting article from Richard Stallman. https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html It starts with:/ / / / /"For a software package to be free, all the code in it must be free. But not only the code. Since documentation files

Re: [DNG] Interesting read from RMS

2015-11-12 Thread Linux O'Beardly
Apologies in advance for digressing, but it honestly amazes me how ignorant and passive Linus and RMS have been about the whole systemd fiasco since it's inception. Also, the one person that really astounded me at his concession to systemd was Shuttleworth. I figured if anyone were going to

Re: [DNG] Interesting read from RMS

2015-11-12 Thread Jaromil
On November 12, 2015 4:11:27 PM GMT+01:00, Emiliano Marini wrote: >Sadly I must agree with you Linux O'Beardly. Maybe there's much money >in >play? It is not about money. Is about Unity. Which in general is good to preserve over non critical diatribes. But they

Re: [DNG] Interesting read from RMS

2015-11-12 Thread Emiliano Marini
Sadly I must agree with you Linux O'Beardly. Maybe there's much money in play? On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Linux O'Beardly wrote: > Apologies in advance for digressing, but it honestly amazes me how > ignorant and passive Linus and RMS have been about the whole

Re: [DNG] Interesting read from RMS

2015-11-12 Thread Simon Hobson
Jaromil wrote: > Of the three perhaps only Linus did, after > all he is an active programmer and reads > regularly code. But he is refraining from > doing universal statements pro or against > the whole of systemd, while interacting > on details, which I think is wise to do for