Hi:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 05:42:37PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> >... why not use waterfox instead of firefox or palemoon?
>
> It doesn't run on my laptop. Grumbles that a library is missing:
>
> laptop3:~/waterfox/waterfox$ >>> ./waterfox
> ./waterfox:
Hi there,
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, zap wrote:
I have largely stayed quiet about this topic,
No need to be shy. :)
... why not use waterfox instead of firefox or palemoon?
It doesn't run on my laptop. Grumbles that a library is missing:
laptop3:~/waterfox/waterfox$ >>> ./waterfox
./waterfox:
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 09:09:57 +0200
"Ivan J." wrote:
> FYI:
>
> Banned packages in Devuan:
> http://amprolla.parazyd.cf/log/bannedpkgs.txt
Here's a line from the preceding:
=
jessie,gummiboot
=
Gummiboot used to be a normal initramfs
I have largely stayed quiet about this topic, but why not use waterfox
instead of firefox or palemoon?
He makes good changes to it removing a lot of unneeded crap. Although,
eme is still an option, most of the junk is removed. That's my thoughts
on this though. and that's easy to disable. :)
On 170706-13:13+0100, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Ooops. Sorry about the previous subject line, finger slipped.
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
>
> > ... I'm currently without a GUI browser, because of:
> > Building Pale Moon on Devuan fails - Pale Moon forum
> >
On 07/07/2017 09:19 AM, Jaromil wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2017, Vincent Bentley wrote:
>
>> On 07/07/17 13:11, zap wrote:
>>> It would be good though if you could allow mate-power-manager into the
>>> software repository with the systemd dependencies removed though...
>> That would require someone
On Fri, 07 Jul 2017, Vincent Bentley wrote:
> On 07/07/17 13:11, zap wrote:
> > It would be good though if you could allow mate-power-manager into the
> > software repository with the systemd dependencies removed though...
>
> That would require someone to create and maintain a Devuan specific
>
On 07/07/17 13:11, zap wrote:
> It would be good though if you could allow mate-power-manager into the
> software repository with the systemd dependencies removed though...
That would require someone to create and maintain a Devuan specific
package and possibly even forking the code depending on
On 07/07/2017 07:02 AM, Ivan J. wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2017, KatolaZ wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:11:38AM +0100, Vincent Bentley wrote:
>>> Is it possible to read the reason why a package has been banned?
>>>
>> I guess the usual reason is that they depend directly on systemd.
>
On Fri, 07 Jul 2017, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:11:38AM +0100, Vincent Bentley wrote:
> > Is it possible to read the reason why a package has been banned?
> >
>
> I guess the usual reason is that they depend directly on systemd.
Indeed, they are banned because they are, or
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:11:38AM +0100, Vincent Bentley wrote:
> Is it possible to read the reason why a package has been banned?
>
I guess the usual reason is that they depend directly on systemd.
HND
KatolaZ
--
[ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ]
[ "+.
Is it possible to read the reason why a package has been banned?
On 07/07/17 08:09, Ivan J. wrote:
> FYI:
>
> Banned packages in Devuan:
> http://amprolla.parazyd.cf/log/bannedpkgs.txt
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Dng
On Fri, 07 Jul 2017, Jaromil wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2017, Vincent Bentley wrote:
>
> > Thanks. I should have checked the archive for stretch too, sorry.
>
> Firegarden is working to improve their package visualisation and
> listing software, pretty soon it will be quick and easy to check these
On Thu, 06 Jul 2017, Vincent Bentley wrote:
> Thanks. I should have checked the archive for stretch too, sorry.
Firegarden is working to improve their package visualisation and
listing software, pretty soon it will be quick and easy to check these
things by glancing at a webpage with list of
14 matches
Mail list logo