Re: [DNG] Docker on Devuan?

Hi, goli...@dyne.org writes: > On 2017-09-07 07:22, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: >> Hi Ozi, >> >> Ozi Traveller writes: >> >>> Just wondering whether anyone has managed to get docker installed on >>> Devuan? >>> >>> If so, how? And are you getting docker updates as well? >> >> Have a look at my blog

Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]

On 09/08/2017 07:18 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote: On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 at 00:22:40 -0400 "taii...@gmx.com" wrote: On 09/07/2017 02:18 PM, Rick Moen wrote: Quoting taii...@gmx.com (taii...@gmx.com): I also find a bit questionable your going around attempting to tarnish the

Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 at 00:22:40 -0400 "taii...@gmx.com" wrote: > On 09/07/2017 02:18 PM, Rick Moen wrote: > >> Quoting taii...@gmx.com (taii...@gmx.com): >> I also find a bit questionable your going around attempting to tarnish the reputation of someone with a real

Re: [DNG] Talos, Intel, libre purism, ...

El 08/09/17 a les 11:02, Arnt Karlsen ha escrit: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:13:17 +0100, Rowland wrote in message > <20170907131317.02a67...@devstation.samdom.example.com>: > >> On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:59:01 +0200 >> Narcis Garcia wrote: >> >>> This thread has now 86 posts,

Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]

On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 23:16:08 -0700, Rick wrote in message <20170908061608.gc9...@linuxmafia.com>: > Quoting taii...@gmx.com (taii...@gmx.com): > > > I apologize - I should have done that in the first place instead of > > resorting to name calling. > > I thank you. > > (In fairness, Mr. Selli

[DNG] ..OT: Can we do new cpu etc hardware, from scratch, on e.g. Google funding?, was: Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:22:40 -0400, taii...@gmx.com wrote in message : > Google has many times attempted to get intel to provide a method to > disable ME and remove it from the boot process for their in house > computers and the coreboot laptops

Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME

On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 16:27:17 +0100, Rowland wrote in message <20170907162717.459c8...@devstation.samdom.example.com>: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:12:25 +0200 > Edward Bartolo wrote: > > > Quote: "Please take this discussion somewhere else, it has NOTHING > > to do with Devuan" > >

Re: [DNG] Talos, Intel, libre purism, ...

On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 11:16:52 -0500, goli...@dyne.org wrote in message <9acf140d828463744afd3e33596e0...@dyne.org>: > On 2017-09-07 10:40, zap wrote: > > On 09/07/2017 08:11 AM, Antony Stone wrote: > >> On Thursday 07 September 2017 at 13:59:01, Narcis Garcia wrote: > >> > >>> This thread has

Re: [DNG] Talos, Intel, libre purism, ...

On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:13:17 +0100, Rowland wrote in message <20170907131317.02a67...@devstation.samdom.example.com>: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:59:01 +0200 > Narcis Garcia wrote: > > > This thread has now 86 posts, and I still don't see a solid > > contribution to Devuan

Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]

On 08.09.2017 09:53, Erik Christiansen wrote: No, one of the variety of CPUs implemented on FPGAs, so not so curious at all. Some FPGAs contain RAM areas, improving the gate efficiency of e.g. a CPU implementation. No, that's just boring ;-) I'm thinking of generating VHDL from fw rules and

Re: [DNG] Purism Librem and disabling Intel ME: it can be done [ Re: TALOS 2 - The Libre Owner Controlled POWER9 Workstation/Server ]

On 07.09.17 17:34, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: > On 07.09.2017 16:12, Erik Christiansen wrote: > > > If the firewall is on a FPGA, then we know what every gate is doing, as > > we have the VHDL source for it. > > An purely FPGA-based firewall (w/o an cpu in it), specifically >