On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 19:38:35 -0800
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Dimitris via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > https://wiki.opennic.org/tier_2_unbound
> >
> > eg. for opennic root servers :
> > # dig . NS @161.97.219.84 > root.hints
>
> Yeah, I _vaguely_ recall (after not paying attention to such
On Wed, 2021-03-10 at 20:04 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Gabe Stanton via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > Of course using a local (or controlled by you) caching dns resolver
> > ENHANCES privacy.
>
> You really should have stopped there.
>
> > That's not even a question and doesn't represen
Quoting Gabe Stanton via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> Of course using a local (or controlled by you) caching dns resolver
> ENHANCES privacy.
You really should have stopped there.
> That's not even a question and doesn't represent a
> real argument against the likelihood that, in the case of ever
Quoting wirelessduck--- via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> Au contraire, I’m running unbound right now on my laptop. There are
> some situations though where it’s not feasible to run one's own
> recursive DNS resolver, such as a home router for non-technical people
> that doesn’t support ddwrt/openwr
Quoting tito via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> then please just don't do it. You are under no obligation to answer,
> As we say in Italy: "To ask is allowed, to answer is a courtesy",
> but once you take the time and effort to answer then it would
> make more sense to me to share your knowledge rath
Quoting Dimitris via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> https://wiki.opennic.org/tier_2_unbound
>
> eg. for opennic root servers :
> # dig . NS @161.97.219.84 > root.hints
Yeah, I _vaguely_ recall (after not paying attention to such matters for
some decades) that their alternate root servers supply rec
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 22:07 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Dimitris via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > so, i would be interested to know, if there's a privacy issue with
> > opennnic?
>
> I have no problem with people who decide to adopt alternate roots.
>
> What I was talking about upthread
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 22:26 -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Gabe Stanton via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > In the absence of a "community of dns server operators and users",
> > is
> > the optimal option to have everyone run their own recursive server?
> > But
> > then the upstream servers sti
Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
>> I doubt this could be ever implemented correctly as you have to check
>> every code path of every app you will armorize or as soon as your usage
>> diverges from what the distro gurus have envisioned your program
>> will stop working without even a warning.
>> Next th
Steve Litt wrote:
> The vast majority of documents I've read tell me that once you make the
> bridge, the hardware NIC must be robbed of its IP addresses. So that's
> what I did.
That is the correct way to do it - though from memory it does seem to still
work for host-LAN communications if you
On 2021-03-10 10:44, Antony Stone wrote:
On Wednesday 10 March 2021 at 10:20:47, vezzoniser...@alice.it wrote:
Hi everyone
This is just to report that I tried to subscribe to the dng list
You appear to have succeeded :)
He only succeeded because this moderator took pity on him and released
On Wednesday 10 March 2021 at 10:20:47, vezzoniser...@alice.it wrote:
> Hi everyone
> This is just to report that I tried to subscribe to the dng list
You appear to have succeeded :)
> but i got redirected to a bug notification page.
Please either tell us what the notification said, or show us
Hi everyone
This is just to report that I tried to subscribe to the dng list but i got
redirected to a bug notification page.
I just have some question which I would like to ask here:
-is it possible to forward a ssh -Y connection with all privileges on another
machine and open a file manager
Στις 10/3/21 4:30 μ.μ., ο/η Dimitris via Dng έγραψε:
but performance-wise is terrible if you're in some low latency connection
correction: "high latency".
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.
Στις 10/3/21 8:07 π.μ., ο/η Rick Moen έγραψε:
What I was talking about upthread was outsourcing one's recursive
nameservice to OpenNIC's public recursive nameserver IPs, or any other
stranger's. Because, well, why? Recursive service is dead-easy to do
with one's local computing resources, prote
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 22:07:07 -0800
Rick Moen wrote:
> What I was talking about upthread was outsourcing one's recursive
> nameservice to OpenNIC's public recursive nameserver IPs, or any other
> stranger's. Because, well, why? Recursive service is dead-easy to do
> with one's local computing res
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:07:14 -0800
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting tito via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > Hi,
> > can this opennic.cache file be downloaded freely or do you need
> > to register?
>
> As mentioned, I have not experimented with alternative DNS roots in
> decades.
>
> I could try to a
On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 23:02:31 -0800
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting tito via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> > Hi,
> > just for fast information, is it enough for unbound to remove:
> >
> > forward-zone:
> > #forward-first: yes
> > name: "."
> > forward-tls-upstream: yes
> >
> On 10 Mar 2021, at 17:11, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting wirelessduck--- via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
>> What’s the consensus on Quad9? Are they any better from a privacy
>> standpoint?
>
> To say again, why outsource recursive nameservice to _anyone_?
>
> You seem like a large number of pe
Στις 10/3/21 8:02 π.μ., ο/η Rick Moen έγραψε:
I'd really like to have both icann and opennic root servers in my
root.hints.
No, you don't.
opennic.cache should include the standard TLD nameservers.
https://wiki.opennic.org/tier_2_unbound
eg. for opennic root servers :
# dig . NS @161.97.21
20 matches
Mail list logo
