dear Nate,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> I emailed a followup to 6...@bugs.devuan.org and received an
> acknowledgment from the BTS but the message has not appeared on the
> bug's Web page.
I have the same problem and this and other issues were addressed in
our last developer
I emailed a followup to 6...@bugs.devuan.org and received an
acknowledgment from the BTS but the message has not appeared on the
bug's Web page.
- Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and
* On 2017 05 Jun 02:07 -0500, KatolaZ wrote:
> Hi Nate,
>
> thanks for your email. The issue is known. That string is saying you
> that reportbug was unable to fetch existing relevant bugs from
> bugs.devuan.org. The reason is that reportbug expects to find a SOAP
> service running on
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:06:44AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
[cut]
>
> We must retain the useful functionalities, avoiding to get absolutely
> everything on board, since there is also a kitchen sink, a washing
> machine, an maybe a crocodile or two in there...:)
>
> In the same spirit, I am also
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 10:00:03PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
[cut]
>
>
> Nevermind that my email address is incorrect as I had not yet created a
> $HOME/.reportbugrc on that computer.
>
> I did create $HOME/.reportbugrc and uncommented the line of "bts
> devuan", set my email, realname, and
I just ran into a similar issue trying to use reportbug on a computer I
installed Devuan 1.0 Stable a week ago today using the Netinstall ISO.
Here is what happened when running reportbug for the first time:
$ reportbug flashplugin-nonfree
Warning: no reportbug configuration found. Proceeding
Am 2017-05-15 06:36, schrieb Steve Litt:
Perhaps not in De**an, but in other distros, I've seen things go to
hell in a handbasket when trying to upgrade to the next major version.
I think here is a little bit confusion about what a "dist-upgrade" is
and does.
It *can* be used for upgrade to a
On Sun, 14 May 2017 20:39:25 +0100
KatolaZ wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:49:14AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > No it doesn't. apt get dist-upgrade must pay attention to your
> > current config files, some of which might have been constructed
> > four
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:49:14AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[cut]
>
> No it doesn't. apt get dist-upgrade must pay attention to your current
> config files, some of which might have been constructed four major
> versions ago and have little current relevance. After dist-upgrade,
> you're very
>
>
> --
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 10:10:19 -0400
> From: fsmithred <fsmith...@gmail.com>
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: Re: [DNG] reportbug default bts
> Message-ID: <ea48b39e-7a32-e773-dad3-3a05090bc...@gmail.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 14 May 2017 11:49:14 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
> This concern that you characterize as a "myth" is something I read in
> various apt package distro mailing lists on a somewhat regular basis.
> I also have one
On Sun, 14 May 2017 12:26:51 +0200
Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Am 2017-05-14 08:23, schrieb KatolaZ:
> >
> > again, there is nothing to fear in dist-upgrade...
>
> That's right. I'm using Debian/Devuan since many years and never had
> a problem with dist-upgrade. I'm
Le 14/05/2017 à 16:10, fsmithred a écrit :
On 05/13/2017 11:03 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sat, 13 May 2017 01:06:38 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
Long before three weeks ago. I don't usually upgrade or
dist-upgrade unless there is some particular need.
Probably I'm not alone, even if
On 05/13/2017 11:03 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2017 01:06:38 -1000
> Joel Roth wrote:
>
>> Long before three weeks ago. I don't usually upgrade or
>> dist-upgrade unless there is some particular need.
>> Probably I'm not alone, even if that is not considered
>> best
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 02:23:50PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 08:08:51AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
> >
> >[cut]
> >
> >> apt-get dist-upgrade is what's necessary to change release - as the
> >> name
> >>means -, eg Wheezy to Jessie or Jessie to Ascii.
> >or if
Am 2017-05-14 08:23, schrieb KatolaZ:
again, there is nothing to fear in dist-upgrade...
That's right. I'm using Debian/Devuan since many years and never had a
problem with dist-upgrade. I'm wondering about this myth that
dist-upgrade could break something. dist-upgrade has the same effect
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 08:08:51AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
[cut]
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade is what's necessary to change release - as the name
> means -, eg Wheezy to Jessie or Jessie to Ascii.
or if you are permanently on testing, since it is not uncommon
there for some upgrades to
Le 13/05/2017 à 17:03, Steve Litt a écrit :
On Sat, 13 May 2017 01:06:38 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
Long before three weeks ago. I don't usually upgrade or
dist-upgrade unless there is some particular need.
Probably I'm not alone, even if that is not considered
best practice.
I
Steve Litt [2017-05-13 17:03]:
> I never dist-upgrade. From what I hear, it breaks things. If I feel the
> need to dist-upgrade, it's probably time to back up, reformat the
> disks, and clean-install a later version.
If you can't dist-upgrade, it's probably time to find another distribution.
--
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 07:36:32PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> ..I came in woody time from the cold dropped Red Hat 7.3, I've
> dist-upgraded from woody and sarge to sid/wheezy, and from lenny
> to sid/Jessie. Only reason I left SuSE-5.2 (It rocked!), was
> I didn't know how to do "insmod
On Sat, 13 May 2017 16:16:48 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message
<20170513151648.gf14...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:03:18AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 May 2017 01:06:38 -1000
> > Joel Roth wrote:
> >
> > > Long before three weeks ago. I don't
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:03:18AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 13 May 2017 01:06:38 -1000
> Joel Roth wrote:
>
> > Long before three weeks ago. I don't usually upgrade or
> > dist-upgrade unless there is some particular need.
> > Probably I'm not alone, even if that is
On Sat, 13 May 2017 01:06:38 -1000
Joel Roth wrote:
> Long before three weeks ago. I don't usually upgrade or
> dist-upgrade unless there is some particular need.
> Probably I'm not alone, even if that is not considered
> best practice.
I never dist-upgrade. From what I hear,
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 01:06:38AM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
[cut]
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> > that's strange again. Do you remember when you dist-upgraded?
> > reportbug-6.6.3+devuan1.3 has been in the repos since about three
> > weeks ago...
>
> Long before three weeks ago. I don't usually upgrade or
KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:11:06PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
[cut]
> > Somehow my upgrade to Devuan somehow missed getting reportbug.
> >
> > $ dpkg -l reportbug
> >
> > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> > |
> >
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 11:11:06PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
[cut]
>
> Hi KatolaZ,
>
> Somehow my upgrade to Devuan somehow missed getting reportbug.
>
> $ dpkg -l reportbug
>
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> |
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 05:54:13AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:41:23PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > When I ran reportbug and filed a bug, I was surprised to
> > see the report went to Debian.
> >
> > /etc/reportbug.conf (which I've never edited)
> > has
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 03:41:23PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
[cut]
>
> When I ran reportbug and filed a bug, I was surprised to
> see the report went to Debian.
>
> /etc/reportbug.conf (which I've never edited)
> has no bts setting.
>
> $ reportbug --bts help
>
> Valid bug tracking systems:
Hi,
I'm running Devuan/Jessie, having migrated from
Debian/Jessie.
Being advised to file bugs at bugs.devuan.org, I viewed the
site, which recommends using reportbug as the preferred
way to report bugs.
When I ran reportbug and filed a bug, I was surprised to
see the report went to Debian.
29 matches
Mail list logo