On 14-04-19 21:03, Jim Jackson wrote:
>
> I find this somewhat amusing. Have you ever followed the linux kernel email
> list, and watched the falling out and aggression there has been on there in
> the past? Linus's (and others) language!! Better not take linux seriously
> any longer :-)
>
>
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:07:44PM +0200, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> You really think that the numbers working on the linux kernel are
> somehow comparable to the numbers working on Devuan?
Every person working on the linux kernel is working on Devuan. Every Debian
developer is
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> After all what happened i cannot take Devuan seriously any longer. And I
> absolutely do not want my systems depending on a distro with such a
> uncertain future.
I find this somewhat amusing. Have you ever followed the linux
IMHO..
I mentioned before that I didn't take your joke badly, and I do think others
shouldn't either.
About corporations:
If they are that interested in Devuan (and yes I'm repeating myself) they
should put some dedicated maintainers our way so we can remove all of
libsystemd0.
I've often
Hi chillfan,
On 14/4/19 10:30, chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
About corporations:
If they are that interested in Devuan (and yes I'm repeating myself) they
should put some dedicated maintainers our way so we can remove all of
libsystemd0.
It's possible to remove entirely libsystemd0.
Aitor.
On 14/4/19 9:59, aitor_czr wrote:
my words have not been aimed against any people who supported devuan
in the past, neither against Centurion Dan nor against KatolaZ
whom i really appreciate :)
Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On 04/14/2019 04:40 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Sunday 14 April 2019 at 10:39:34, aitor_czr wrote:
>
>> On 14/4/19 10:30, chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
>>> About corporations:
>>>
>>> If they are that interested in Devuan (and yes I'm repeating myself) they
>>> should put some dedicated maintainers
Hi fsmithred,
On 14/4/19 11:22, fsmithred via Dng wrote:
On 04/14/2019 04:40 AM, Antony Stone wrote:
On Sunday 14 April 2019 at 10:39:34, aitor_czr wrote:
On 14/4/19 10:30, chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
About corporations:
If they are that interested in Devuan (and yes I'm repeating myself)
dear Massimo and mett,
thanks for your messages. I think right now they well represent the
spirit of the caretakers and the actual situation. You are very
welcome to get involved, through the devuan-dev list and Wednesday's
dev meetings.
We will face this empasse in a constructive way. Katolaz
On 14/4/19 11:46, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
I did support Devuan with mirror.smallinnovations.nl and
devuan.smallinnovations.nl (and do until 30 april).
I can read :)
So what exactly is your point except that you apparently like to bully
people?
Bully people? Who is bulling
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 05:21:48AM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 01:51:39AM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
> >
> > Following common understanding with other caretakers and parallel to
> > the work on the conference documentation, I have started this website,
> > soon to be
In beowulf at least you can use libelogind0 in place of libsystemd0 but
packages still require something that provides it.
libelogind0 shares some code with libsystemd0 and of course we only need it to
provide some desktops, so there are things left where we don't need it.
In beowulf at least
On 13/4/19 16:34, mett wrote:
While everybody is obviously free to leave if he realizes he does not
share the same goal as the rest of the project, we are still facing a
crisis. I thus believe that we should win over people who supported devuan in
the
past, not fight with them.
Of course, i
On 14/4/19 9:55, aitor_czr wrote:
On 13/4/19 16:34, mett wrote:
While everybody is obviously free to leave if he realizes he does not
share the same goal as the rest of the project, we are still facing a
crisis. I thus believe that we should win over people who supported devuan in
the
past,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:54:31 +0200
Steffen Dettmer via Dng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At work I'm playing with Devuan in a VM supposed to replace
> embedded systems. These systems have special proprietary software
> which is deployed using a proprietary package manager, which
> unfortunately does not
On 14/4/19 10:40, Antony Stone wrote:
How difficult is "possible"?
Antony.
Not so difficult. I'll work on that.
Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On Sunday 14 April 2019 at 10:39:34, aitor_czr wrote:
> On 14/4/19 10:30, chillfan--- via Dng wrote:
> > About corporations:
> >
> > If they are that interested in Devuan (and yes I'm repeating myself) they
> > should put some dedicated maintainers our way so we can remove all of
> >
On 14-04-19 09:55, aitor_czr wrote:
> On 13/4/19 16:34, mett wrote:
>> While everybody is obviously free to leave if he realizes he does not
>> share the same goal as the rest of the project, we are still facing a
>> crisis. I thus believe that we should win over people who supported devuan
>>
On 14-04-19 14:56, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> And I repeat: I wishyou all the best luck in the world, you really
> need it :)
>
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=systemd
>
> Cheers,
>
> Aitor.
>
Well Devuan needs that luck even more. I do not like systemd but it is
supported by those
On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 03:53:41PM +0200, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
> Well Devuan needs that luck even more. I do not like systemd but it is
> supported by those hated corporations (not only Red Sweat). And they
> will pay for removing all those bugs. For Devuan the question has
20 matches
Mail list logo
