[dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-edns0-padding

During the meeting on Monday, it was obvious the Working Group wanted to make this an official EDNS option. We reached out to the author and while he is traveling for an extended period of time, he is happy to work on edits (with a small delay built in, but nothing this impatient chair

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-edns0-padding

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Tim Wicinski wrote: This starts a Call for Adoption fordraft-mayrhofer-edns0-padding I support the adoption by DPRIVE and will review it. The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mayrhofer-edns0-padding/ Paul

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-edns0-padding

I support the adoption by DPRIVE and I will comment on it and review it. Initial comment about Section 4: However, padded DNS messages MUST NOT exceed the respective UDP payload size (see Section 6.2.3 and 6.2.4 of [RFC6891]). The above text is potentially confusing for when the use of

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-mayrhofer-edns0-padding

I think is a good document and I support it and will review. Olafur > On Nov 3, 2015, at 7:54 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > During the meeting on Monday, it was obvious the Working Group wanted to make > this an official EDNS option. We reached out to the author and