Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls-01

2015-11-13 Thread Tim Wicinski
All, The WGLC has finished, and it appears to be rough consensus on moving forward. I want to touch base with my co-chair and AD on one issue, but I will work on the Shepherd write up over the next few days and submit it into the pipeline. I plan on mentioning the issues raised about

Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls-01

2015-11-13 Thread Tim Wicinski
On 11/13/15 8:22 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: Just to be clear: do the chairs read the rough consensus to be that the draft needs to remove Sections 3.2 and all of Section 4, and move them to a new document? --Paul Hoffman Yes, I do (once I remembered). I am circling back with the others,

Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls-01

2015-11-13 Thread Paul Hoffman
On 13 Nov 2015, at 3:31, Tim Wicinski wrote: The WGLC has finished, and it appears to be rough consensus on moving forward. I want to touch base with my co-chair and AD on one issue, but I will work on the Shepherd write up over the next few days and submit it into the pipeline. I plan on

Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls-01

2015-11-13 Thread Sara Dickinson
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 16:39, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > On 13 Nov 2015, at 8:28, Tim Wicinski wrote: > >> On 11/13/15 8:22 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> >>> >>> Just to be clear: do the chairs read the rough consensus to be that the >>> draft needs to remove Sections 3.2 and

Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls-01

2015-11-13 Thread Warren Kumari
Doh. Messages passed in the ether. W On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Whoops, Sara is right and I was wrong. What the WG agreed to was in the > slides in Yokohama: > > = > Explicitly state that an upcoming document will define further >

Re: [dns-privacy] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls-01

2015-11-13 Thread Paul Hoffman
Whoops, Sara is right and I was wrong. What the WG agreed to was in the slides in Yokohama: = Explicitly state that an upcoming document will define further authentication profiles Draft in development, will be submitted ASAP This draft will document Opportunistic and briefly cite the