All,
The WGLC has finished, and it appears to be rough consensus on moving
forward. I want to touch base with my co-chair and AD on one issue, but
I will work on the Shepherd write up over the next few days and submit
it into the pipeline. I plan on mentioning the issues raised about
On 11/13/15 8:22 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Just to be clear: do the chairs read the rough consensus to be that the
draft needs to remove Sections 3.2 and all of Section 4, and move them
to a new document?
--Paul Hoffman
Yes, I do (once I remembered). I am circling back with the others,
On 13 Nov 2015, at 3:31, Tim Wicinski wrote:
The WGLC has finished, and it appears to be rough consensus on moving
forward. I want to touch base with my co-chair and AD on one issue,
but I will work on the Shepherd write up over the next few days and
submit it into the pipeline. I plan on
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 16:39, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> On 13 Nov 2015, at 8:28, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/15 8:22 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Just to be clear: do the chairs read the rough consensus to be that the
>>> draft needs to remove Sections 3.2 and
Doh. Messages passed in the ether.
W
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Whoops, Sara is right and I was wrong. What the WG agreed to was in the
> slides in Yokohama:
>
> =
> Explicitly state that an upcoming document will define further
>
Whoops, Sara is right and I was wrong. What the WG agreed to was in the
slides in Yokohama:
=
Explicitly state that an upcoming document will define further
authentication profiles
Draft in development, will be submitted ASAP
This draft will document Opportunistic and briefly cite the