All
Brian and I thank all for attending the DPRIVE interim yesterday, and we
want to thank Eric our AD for helping out with slides at the last minute.
I've uploaded the minutes which were in the Etherpad (Thanks Benno!)
The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-ghedini-dprive-early-data in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ghedini-dprive-early-data/
___
dns-privacy mailing list
The DPRIVE WG has placed draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Tim Wicinski)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic/
___
dns-privacy mailing list
In my view DoQ is a valuable addition to the set of IETF protocols, and
clearly has benefit over DoH for some use cases, as Ralf has explained. In
particular it would seem to be very useful in recursive to authoritative;
Christian referred to this in the presentation. I know the document is
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:36 AM Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> On 9 Apr 2020, at 14:24, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>>> How about making the last sentence a little more specific instead:
>>>
>>> If not, then (depending on the application and transport used for DNS
>>> queries) users should take
> On 9 Apr 2020, at 14:24, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>>
>> How about making the last sentence a little more specific instead:
>>
>> If not, then (depending on the application and transport used for DNS
>> queries) users should take note that they may not be able to inspect the DNS
>>
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:00 AM Sara Dickinson wrote:
>
>
> On 7 Apr 2020, at 17:22, Eric Orth wrote:
>
> "consistent application-level controls across the device"
>
> Right there is where followers of the misunderstanding will read this text
> incorrectly. Browsers and other non-malicious
> Il 07/04/2020 18:22 Eric Orth ha scritto:
>
>
> "consistent application-level controls across the device"
>
> Right there is where followers of the misunderstanding will read this
> text incorrectly. Browsers and other non-malicious applications allowing
> control does not
> On 7 Apr 2020, at 17:22, Eric Orth wrote:
>
> "consistent application-level controls across the device"
>
> Right there is where followers of the misunderstanding will read this text
> incorrectly. Browsers and other non-malicious applications allowing control
> does not guarantee
I support adoption of the document and will provide review (and, if
appropriate, text).
Best,
Alex
Von: dns-privacy Im Auftrag von Tim Wicinski
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. April 2020 18:41
An: DNS Privacy Working Group
Cc: dprive-cha...@ietf.org
Betreff: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption:
I support adoption and I am willing to review.
Manu
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:41 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic/
>
> Please review this
On 09. 04. 20 7:49, Ralf Weber wrote:
> Moin!
>
> On 8 Apr 2020, at 18:55, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On Apr 8, 2020, at 9:41 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic
>>>
>>> The draft is available here:
>>>
I'm
On Wednesday, April 8, 2020, Daniel Migault wrote:
> I am supporting the adoption and will review the document.
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
I also support and will review the document.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:19 PM Ted Hardie wrote:
>
>> I support adoption and I would be willing to review
13 matches
Mail list logo
