In my view DoQ is a valuable addition to the set of IETF protocols, and clearly has benefit over DoH for some use cases, as Ralf has explained. In particular it would seem to be very useful in recursive to authoritative; Christian referred to this in the presentation. I know the document is focussed on stub to recursive but even here the simplicity achieved by removing the HTTP layer has got to be attractive for some subset of deployments. I therefore support adoption, and am happy to review.
Chris On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 08:13, Alexander Mayrhofer <[email protected]> wrote: > I support adoption of the document and will provide review (and, if > appropriate, text). > > > > Best, > > Alex > > > > > > *Von:* dns-privacy <[email protected]> *Im Auftrag von *Tim > Wicinski > *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 8. April 2020 18:41 > *An:* DNS Privacy Working Group <[email protected]> > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Betreff:* [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic > > > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DPRIVE, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 22 April 2020 > > Thanks, > > tim/brian > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
