Those who are following the discussion on oblivious DNS and oblivious DoH might
be interested in a draft just posted:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-http-oblivious-00.html
We're asking this to be dispatched in SECDISPATCH, so any thoughts you might
have about venue should be
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 21:35 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > I'm not one of the authors, but re-reading the draft with "intermingling"
> > in focus, I think the issues are:
> > - The intermingling aspect originates in RFC5936 (over TCP)
>
> Several people have pointed that out to me - I
Hi Brian,
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 10:28 -0800, Brian Dickson wrote:
> >
> > However, there's one part that bothers me. The 'intermingling' of multiple
> > XFRs over a single connection (which is a SHOULD, not a MUST, so the
> > document 'gets away with it', or conversely, implementations will
