Hiya,
On 12/07/2021 18:12, Tim Wicinski wrote:
The concern with lumping the root, TLDs, and SLDs into one solution is that
there are contractual issues with what can be in a zone above an SLD.
I agree that different solutions will be needed for those
three quite different kinds of zone.
All,
The chairs have been watching the working group while we prepare for the
upcoming meeting, and working through the proposals and arguments that keep
coming up. We feel there is strong consensus to work on opportunistic
encryption and that it may be beneficial to discuss possible
Hi All,
This update includes the following changes:
* Expand the scope to include use of DoQ for recursive to authoritative, and
for zone transfer
* Update the stream mapping to include a 2-octet message length and to permit
multiple responses on a single stream
* Clarify the handling of
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG of the IETF.
Title : Specification of DNS over Dedicated QUIC Connections
Authors : Christian Huitema
Greetings again. We have published draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative-03
based on the general feeling that the WG wants to keep the WG unauthenticated
draft and possible future WG fully-authenticated drafts separate for now. We
will let draft-pp-dprive-common-features wither away unless
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange WG of the IETF.
Title : Recursive to Authoritative DNS with Unauthenticated
Encryption
Authors : Paul Hoffman
