All,
The chairs have been watching the working group while we prepare for the upcoming meeting, and working through the proposals and arguments that keep coming up. We feel there is strong consensus to work on opportunistic encryption and that it may be beneficial to discuss possible experimental deployments with a version of the currently documented approach (draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative). The concern with lumping the root, TLDs, and SLDs into one solution is that there are contractual issues with what can be in a zone above an SLD. These limitations are potentially an issue with some solutions that need/want new records in the parent’s zone. We feel like the WG will not be able to make additional progress on any of the proposed solutions until we can reach consensus on whether the solution should be homogeneous from the root down or that the real focus is on SLDs and down. We've asked Paul and Petr to not focus on the common-features document and move that content back into their draft. The authors of draft-rescorla-dprive-adox-latest will be incorporating concepts from draft-schwartz-dprive-name-signal as a next step for the authenticated encryption proposal. This should provide a more concrete proposal that can be considered for WG adoption. The chairs would like to solicit any input/feedback on the above as we prepare for our session during IETF 111. Tim & Brian
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
