A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9103
Title: DNS Zone Transfer over TLS
Author: W. Toorop,
S. Dickinson,
S. Sahib,
P. Aras,
A. Mankin
On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 08:18 -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic/
>
> We would like to hear comments/questions on the applicability of DoQ to
> the three use cases described in the draft:
>
>1. Stub to recursive resolver
>2. Recursive
Apologies for the confusion. This is supposed to be to Paul H. and not to Paul
W.
Thanks
Zaid
From: dns-privacy on behalf of "AlBanna, Zaid"
Date: Monday, August 23, 2021 at 10:33 AM
To: "p...@nohats.ca" , "peter.van.d...@powerdns.com"
Cc: "paul.hoff...@icann.org" , "dpr...@ietf.org"
Dear Peter and Paul,
I hope you are well. Please find below comments on
draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to-authoritative-03. Please share your thoughts.
Regards,
Zaid
1.1. Use Case for Unauthenticated Encryption
Justification:
The addition here is based on the understanding I took away from the last
Hello.
On 16/08/2021 14.18, Brian Haberman wrote:
1. Stub to recursive resolver
2. Recursive resolver to authoritative servers
3. Zone transfers
Do you agree/disagree that the use cases should be considered for DoQ?
I'm certainly glad that 2 got included. I probably even
