Hi,
I thinks it’s ok to do Experimental. If the authors care, that might be a
discussion point. My perspective is that there are many worse documents
that are unimplemented but that enjoy “Proposed Standard” status.
thanks,
Rob
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 20:12 Brian Haberman
wrote:
> Tim & I
Tim & I checked in with our AD on this. Given that the charter text calls
out Experimental, that is a binding agreement with the IESG.
Our choices are simple:
1) publish as Experimental
2) re-charter
If the intended status had just been in the milestones, we would have more
flexibility.
Let’s
> -Original Message-
> From: dns-privacy On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 4:02 PM
> To: Tim Wicinski
> Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC :
> draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-
> probing
>
> Caution: This email originated from
On Jun 5, 2023, at 12:45 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> The Chairs and Eric are working on the asumption that the document will be
> parked waiting for another implementation or two and some interopt testing
>
> However, we are usinfg this time for Early area reviews which will feel will
> bei
Scott
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 3:36 PM Hollenbeck, Scott
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dns-privacy On Behalf Of Paul
> Hoffman
> > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 3:32 PM
> > To: Tim Wicinski
> > Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC :
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dns-privacy On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
> Sent: Monday, June 5, 2023 3:32 PM
> To: Tim Wicinski
> Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WGLC :
> draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-
> probing
>
> Caution: This email originated from
We have turned in -07, which covers Yorgos' issues (thanks!) and the int-dir
review (thanks!). We believe it is ready to move to IETF Review.
--Paul Hoffman
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the DNS PRIVate Exchange
(DPRIVE) WG of the IETF.
Title : Unilateral Opportunistic Deployment of Encrypted
Recursive-to-Authoritative DNS
Authors :
Thanks for the early review!
On Jun 5, 2023, at 11:41 AM, Haoyu Song via Datatracker
wrote:
> The description in 4.6.2 is confusing. If the first condition causes Q to be
> removed, then if R is successful, Q no longer exists. Then how can R be
> further processed? The logic here should be
Review is partially done. Another assignment may be needed to complete it.
Reviewer: Haoyu Song
Review result: Ready with Nits
Below are a few questions, nits, suggestions.
The description in 4.6.2 is confusing. If the first condition causes Q to be
removed, then if R is successful, Q no
Tim Wicinski, a chair of the dprive working group, indicated that the dprive
working group does not plan to hold a session at IETF 117.
This message was generated and sent by the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool.
___
dns-privacy mailing list
11 matches
Mail list logo
