Re: [dns-privacy] please adopt draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing as a WG work item Re: New Version Notification for draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing-02.txt

2022-02-10 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 12:59 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Hi Peter, DPRIVE folks-- > > On Thu 2022-02-03 11:03:35 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > Speaking only for myself: some of the parts still seem too prescriptive > > to me (but I know I haven't been clear on what parts!). Examples:

Re: [dns-privacy] please adopt draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing as a WG work item Re: New Version Notification for draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing-02.txt

2022-02-07 Thread Joey Salazar
Hi dkg, Peter, dprive, On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:00 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2022-02-03 11:03:35 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > Speaking only for myself: some of the parts still seem too prescriptive > > to me (but I know I haven't been clear on what parts!). Examples: 4.3.1 > >

Re: [dns-privacy] please adopt draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing as a WG work item Re: New Version Notification for draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing-02.txt

2022-02-03 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Hi Peter, DPRIVE folks-- On Thu 2022-02-03 11:03:35 +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote: > Speaking only for myself: some of the parts still seem too prescriptive > to me (but I know I haven't been clear on what parts!). Examples: 4.3.1 > seems too focused on some specific load balancer implementations,

[dns-privacy] please adopt draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing as a WG work item Re: New Version Notification for draft-dkgjsal-dprive-unilateral-probing-02.txt

2022-02-03 Thread Peter van Dijk
Daniel, Joey, On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 16:43 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > ### Substantive changes from -01 to -02 > > - Clarify that deployment to a pool does not need to be strictly simultaneous > - Explain why authoritatives need to serve the same records regardless of SNI > -