Hi Ralf,
On 12/17/18 8:01 AM, Ralf Weber wrote:
> Moin!
>
> On 29 Nov 2018, at 21:59, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> I believe all virtual interim meetings that use Webex are recorded. We
>> will also have minute takers and jabber scribes like in-person meetings.
> Ok so it’s a week after the meeting,
Moin!
On 29 Nov 2018, at 21:59, Brian Haberman wrote:
I believe all virtual interim meetings that use Webex are recorded. We
will also have minute takers and jabber scribes like in-person
meetings.
Ok so it’s a week after the meeting, but I haven’t seen an
announcement of the location of the
On 12/10/18 10:46 AM, Barry Greene wrote:
> Will the meeting be recorded?
>
Yes. I will record the session via Webex and work with the secretariat
to get the recording posted.
Regards,
Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Will the meeting be recorded?
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
I see dialing info of
1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)
Access code: 640 873 331
I am digging up alternative numbers.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:18 AM Henderson, Karl wrote:
> Is there a dial-in number for the dprive webex meeting today?
>
Hi all,
On 28/11/2018 15:19, Brian Haberman wrote:
> The main focus of this interim will be item #3. Benno & Alex have
> volunteered to collect all the issues and requirements that have been
> raised during our mailing list discussions into a draft that will be the
> basis of that
On 12/1/2018 4:41 AM, Hugo Connery wrote:
> Recursive resolvers serve a wide variety of stub resolvers
> over varying operating systems from some network(s), which the
> operator gets to choose, but the resolvers need to be within those
> network(s). Some companies choose to offer
Hugo Connery 于2018年12月1日周六 下午8:41写道：
> Hi Karl and list,
>
> No and Yes.
>
> The introduction section says "out of scope" not "there are
> different attack vectors and operational concerns".
>
> ... and then I got to thinking. (sorry about that)
>
> But, I do agree that there are differences
Hi Karl and list,
No and Yes.
The introduction section says "out of scope" not "there are
different attack vectors and operational concerns".
... and then I got to thinking. (sorry about that)
But, I do agree that there are differences between the types
of attackers for recursers and
cy] DNS PRIVate Exchange (dprive) WG
> Virtual Meeting: 2018-12-10
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
>
> >> Why wait ? Let's hear what he has to say on the list beforehand, so
> >> we can discuss on the list and if needed during the interim. It would
> >
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
Why wait ? Let's hear what he has to say on the list beforehand, so we can
discuss on the list and if needed during the interim. It would be a better
use of our voice-to-voice time.
Here's what's been shared with the list already:
Hiya,
On 30/11/2018 15:40, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> Here's what's been shared with the list already:
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/YHAa2kLGcKHMPEjkJQpQJ_Amfeo
Thanks for that. I fully agree that analysing the risks
here is needed. I didn't really understand this bit
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Bill Woodcock wrote:
And as an operator of recursive and authoritative servers, I’d very much like
us all to listen to what Karl is going to say. I suspect Stéphane will be
interested as well. :-)
Why wait ? Let's hear what he has to say on the list beforehand, so we
Moin!
> On 28. Nov 2018, at 19:01, Brian Haberman wrote:
> It will be put in a draft, but the chairs would prefer to have active
> (virtual) face-to-face discussion on them prior to Prague. That
> discussion should help frame the direction the WG needs to go next.
Which is why I don’t like it to
As a representative of a large root and tld operator, I’d like to request ~10
minutes (in case my comments spark discussion) on the dprive interim agenda in
order to make some observations and recommendations regarding privacy between
the recursive and authoritative name servers.
Moin!
It may be just me, but canceling the meeting in Bangkok at IETF 103 last minute
when people where there physically or could make them available as the IETF
dates are known well in advance and now scheduling an interim meeting with
relative short notice when people might have other plans
Hi all,
The main focus of this interim will be item #3. Benno & Alex have
volunteered to collect all the issues and requirements that have been
raised during our mailing list discussions into a draft that will be the
basis of that discussion.
I will share the Webex information with the
17 matches
Mail list logo
