On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Tim WIcinski wrote:
>
> (no hats)
>
> With this new version, I think the document is useful and provides a solid
> discussion of how to quantify privacy mechanisms for a DNS implementer who
> is not a security subject matter expert.
>
> tim
>
On 11/02/2015 04:22 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Despite my comments against the hum at the mic, I have read this
> document and think it should certainly be adopted. I just don't want
> Yet Another Meaningless Commitment.
I think the document is useful, particularly in its overview of many
(no hats)
With this new version, I think the document is useful and provides a
solid discussion of how to quantify privacy mechanisms for a DNS
implementer who is not a security subject matter expert.
tim
On 11/2/15 6:22 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
Despite my comments against the hum at the