Re: [dns-privacy] draft-am-dprive-eval-02

2015-11-02 Thread Bob Harold
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Tim WIcinski wrote: > > (no hats) > > With this new version, I think the document is useful and provides a solid > discussion of how to quantify privacy mechanisms for a DNS implementer who > is not a security subject matter expert. > > tim >

Re: [dns-privacy] draft-am-dprive-eval-02

2015-11-02 Thread Wendy Seltzer
On 11/02/2015 04:22 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Despite my comments against the hum at the mic, I have read this > document and think it should certainly be adopted. I just don't want > Yet Another Meaningless Commitment. I think the document is useful, particularly in its overview of many

Re: [dns-privacy] draft-am-dprive-eval-02

2015-11-02 Thread Tim WIcinski
(no hats) With this new version, I think the document is useful and provides a solid discussion of how to quantify privacy mechanisms for a DNS implementer who is not a security subject matter expert. tim On 11/2/15 6:22 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: Despite my comments against the hum at the