Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] DNS PRIVate Exchange (dprive) WG Virtual Meeting: 2018-12-10

2018-12-05 Thread Brian Haberman
Hi Paul, On 12/5/18 12:23 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, Brian Haberman wrote: > >> While MLS is still in its infancy, it is designed for many-to-many >> communications. That may be beneficial when we are talking about >> authoritative servers using anycast. > > MLS is about

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] DNS PRIVate Exchange (dprive) WG Virtual Meeting: 2018-12-10

2018-12-05 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 10:22:49PM +0530, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > Nod, HTTPS has demonstrated that TLS can be scalable (even more so in > recent years) and DNS is not different in this aspect. This is one > aspect for protocol selection. I also worry about roundtrips in > recursive resolution.

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] DNS PRIVate Exchange (dprive) WG Virtual Meeting: 2018-12-10

2018-12-05 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Dec 5, 2018, at 6:25 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Paul Hoffman wrote: > >>> I am not sure I see a need for a different TLS/DTLS profile compared to >>> regular (web) based (D)TLS connections. What do you or Karl think would >>> be different? >> >> (D)TLS is not the only