Re: [dns-privacy] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op

2019-11-11 Thread Sara Dickinson
> On 7 Nov 2019, at 00:17, Christoph wrote: > > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:> * "A DNS privacy service must be engineered > for high availability." >> I'm not in favor of this sentence. 1) It seems to despise small >> resolvers managed by small organisations, while we need many diverse >> DoT

Re: [dns-privacy] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op

2019-11-11 Thread Sara Dickinson
> On 7 Nov 2019, at 15:57, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 01:16:29PM +, > Sara Dickinson wrote > a message of 241 lines which said: > >> The current usage is the result of a discussion on the very first >> version of the draft (draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op-00,

Re: [dns-privacy] DPRIVE Interim: 10/29

2019-11-11 Thread Brian Haberman
The minutes for the interim have been posted on the meeting materials page. Please review and provide any feedback to the chairs. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2019-dprive-01-201910291100/ Regards, Brian & Tim On 10/25/19 9:25 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: >

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] Threat Model

2019-11-11 Thread Bob Harold
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:17 PM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Nov 8, 2019, at 20:13, Brian Dickson > wrote: > > > > > More anecdotal stuff is at https://ianix.com/pub/dnssec-outages.html which > lumps together information about TLD failures (now very rare), sites with > failures (becoming