On 7/21/2023 11:56 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Substantial bits below; others were accepted withtout note.
On Jul 17, 2023, at 5:06 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
wrote:
# Shepherd's write-ip
The shepherd's write-up states "the WG would like to ensure that this list remains in the
document once
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 3:27 PM Christian Huitema
wrote:
>
> IF we were serious about the "informational only" status, then we would
> [...]
>
Disagree. Non-standards track RFCs can have these requirements. For
example, they may be documents never intended for the standards track (in
that they
