On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 3:27 PM Christian Huitema <huit...@huitema.net> wrote:
> > IF we were serious about the "informational only" status, then we would > [...] > Disagree. Non-standards track RFCs can have these requirements. For example, they may be documents never intended for the standards track (in that they never intend to give the IETF change control), or rejected alternatives. This document does exactly what is called for by RFC 7322: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7322#section-4.8.2 thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
