On 11/24/14 5:26 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 11/24/14 1:05 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
I did not say a requirements document. I said the Problem Statement, and
evaluation metrics. Neither are requirements.
I've been concerned about the proliferation of problem statement
documents (and use case
(I was waiting to confirm the wording with Warren, but I failed to
remember he was away last week).
Coming out of IETF91, we saw good discussion around the problem
statement; the beginnings of a discussion around evaluation metrics; and
several different solutions searching for the
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Tim Wicinski tjw.i...@gmail.com wrote:
(I was waiting to confirm the wording with Warren, but I failed to remember
he was away last week).
Coming out of IETF91, we saw good discussion around the problem statement;
the beginnings of a discussion around
Just one comment for now, before setting out into commuter-land: evaluation is
not the same as requirements. I heard an AD statement at the mic to avoid
adding any kind of requirements document, and I agree with that, as, I’m sure,
do many others in the WG.
Allison
On Nov 24, 2014, at 5:02
