Daniel, Joey, Paul,
As I am doing my AD review, may I check with the 3 authors whether they are
aware of any IPR behind the one cited by Brian below ?
Thanks, in advance,
-éric
On 07/07/2023, 15:03, "dns-privacy on behalf of Brian Haberman"
mailto:dns-privacy-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf
Hi all,
I am in the process of preparing the shepherd writeup for this
draft as a part of advancing it to the IESG for publication. Part of
that process involves verifying any/all IPR declarations on the
document. At this point, there is one IPR declaration.
All,
An update on the status of this draft. I have asked the authors to
review all the feedback, provide the mailing list with responses to the
comments, and then publish a new version.
Thanks to everyone who has provided feedback to date!
Regards,
Brian
On 3/24/23 9:53 AM, Brian
Hi all,
On 27/03/2023 10:24, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
* Unbound implementation is not ready, but I let Yorgos elaborate on
this point.
The Unbound implementation is far from ready but the hackathon time was
well spent to identify needed changes to Unbound to cleanly support
unilateral
Moin!
On 29 Mar 2023, at 17:57, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:29:46PM +0900,
> Ralf Weber wrote
> a message of 30 lines which said:
>
>> As I don’t think probing for secure transport is a good idea and
>> hope that we will come up with better solutions that follows
On 2023-03-29 17:57 +09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:29:46PM +0900,
> Ralf Weber wrote
> a message of 30 lines which said:
>
>> As I don’t think probing for secure transport is a good idea and
>> hope that we will come up with better solutions that follows the DNS
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:29:46PM +0900,
Ralf Weber wrote
a message of 30 lines which said:
> As I don’t think probing for secure transport is a good idea and
> hope that we will come up with better solutions that follows the DNS
> delegation model.
You mean the parent announcing the zone
Moin!
On 13 Mar 2023, at 0:43, Brian Haberman wrote:
> The chairs will note that the document is currently marked as Proposed
> Standard and that there has been a suggestion to move it to Experimental. If
> you have an opinion on the status at this time, please include it in your
>
On 2023-03-28 09:54 +02, Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 27. 03. 23 8:00, Florian Obser wrote:
>> At the very least this should be pointed out, e.g. at the end of
>> 3. Guidance for Authoritative Servers:
>> An authoritative server implementing DoT or DoQ MUST
>> authoritatively
>> server the
On 27. 03. 23 8:00, Florian Obser wrote:
Hi there!
first, there is a typo in section 4.5:
The recursive resolver SHOULD keep a record of the state for each
authoritative server it contacts, indexed by the IP address of the
authoritative server and the encrypted transports supported
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:35:07AM +0100,
Joey Salazar wrote
a message of 115 lines which said:
> On this note, we the authors want to invite folks to participate in
> this week's Hackathon: I'll be there on Sunday and Benno and Yorgos
> from NLnet Labs will be there since Saturday working on
Hi there!
first, there is a typo in section 4.5:
The recursive resolver SHOULD keep a record of the state for each
authoritative server it contacts, indexed by the IP address of the
authoritative server and the encrypted transports supported by the
recursive resolver.
Should be
All,
Given the point raised by Paul about the Hackathon effort related
to this draft, the chairs have decided to extend the WGLC for an
additional two weeks to allow for feedback from the Hackathon.
This WGLC now ends on April 9, 2023.
Regards,
Brian
On 3/12/23 11:43 AM, Brian
> On Mar 12, 2023, at 8:43 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>
> All,
> This starts a 2-week WGLC for draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing-05.
> This call is to determine if the document is sufficiently complete to
> facilitate implementations and interoperability testing. Once that
>
Just a reminder for WG participants to comment on the draft. The last
call ends in 4 days. Thanks to Scott for chiming in with his perspective.
Regards,
Brian
On 3/12/23 11:43 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
All,
This starts a 2-week WGLC for
draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing-05. This
> -Original Message-
> From: dns-privacy On Behalf Of Brian
> Haberman
> Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2023 11:43 AM
> To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [dns-privacy] WGLC :
> draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing
>
> All,
> This starts a 2-wee
Hi all,
Thank you Brian.
On this note, we the authors want to invite folks to participate in this
week's Hackathon: I'll be there on Sunday and Benno and Yorgos from NLnet
Labs will be there since Saturday working on unilateral probing in Unbound.
Remote participation also welcome and
All,
This starts a 2-week WGLC for
draft-ietf-dprive-unilateral-probing-05. This call is to determine if
the document is sufficiently complete to facilitate implementations and
interoperability testing. Once that determination is made, the chairs
will park this document in the
18 matches
Mail list logo
