On 26/11/2018 15:37, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Ah! That is interesting to hear. Any links that you have to that
would be greatly appreciated.
(I meant UKNOF, not UKNOT)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tMGD6J04Jk
Sara took a *lot* of off-mic discussion after that session, too.
You may feel
On Nov 26, 2018, at 6:31 AM, Ray Bellis wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2018 16:45, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
>> The current round of pushback, all of which appeared after the standard was
>> finished, seems to mostly be coming from DNS vendors, not ISPs or DNS
>> operators.
>
> There was _plenty_ of
On 23/11/2018 16:45, Paul Hoffman wrote:
The current round of pushback, all of which appeared after the
standard was finished, seems to mostly be coming from DNS vendors,
not ISPs or DNS operators.
There was _plenty_ of pushback when this got presented at UKNOT,
especially among those ISPs
In article <57202511-6de3-4bea-b65e-afbcaff40...@bellis.me.uk> you write:
>(I meant UKNOF, not UKNOT)
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tMGD6J04Jk
>
>Sara took a *lot* of off-mic discussion after that session, too.
I gather mandatory DNS blocks like this are common throughout Europe,
with
Paul Hoffman writes:
> >> During the development of the DoH standard, people from many DNS
> >> vendors (including the one you work for) contributed to the spec
> >> without objection in the WG.
[snip other comments]
One issue with the IETF specifications is that we allow for, and should
allow
