Hi Paul,
To further clarify, we are not suggesting a change to the DoT protocol and are
making liberal use of the final sentence in the Abstract of RFC7858 and echoed
in the Introduction of RFC8310: "It does not prevent future applications of the
protocol to recursive-to-authoritative traffic."
On Aug 15, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Henderson, Karl
wrote:
>
> To be clear, ADoT is not a new standard. This is simply DNS over TLS as
> specified in RFC7858,
RFC 7858 makes it clear that it is for stub-to-recursive. That is called out in
the Abstract and the Introduction.
> further defined as ADo
