Hi Paul,
To further clarify, we are not suggesting a change to the DoT protocol and are
making liberal use of the final sentence in the Abstract of RFC7858 and echoed
in the Introduction of RFC8310: "It does not prevent future applications of the
protocol to recursive-to-authoritative traffic."
Regards,
Karl
On 8/15/19, 4:15 PM, "Paul Hoffman" wrote:
On Aug 15, 2019, at 12:24 PM, Henderson, Karl
wrote:
>
> To be clear, ADoT is not a new standard. This is simply DNS over TLS as
specified in RFC7858,
RFC 7858 makes it clear that it is for stub-to-recursive. That is called
out in the Abstract and the Introduction.
> further defined as ADoT in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-ter-02,
That is a, um, "creative" reading of the phrase "later defined".
--Paul Hoffman
___
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
