Re: [dns-privacy] Implementer Perspective
Brian Haberman wrote: > This week (10/15 - 10/21) let's focus on the implementer's > perspective on DNS privacy between recursive resolvers and authoritative > servers. Olafur's RIPE talk discusses this to some degree, advocating the advantages of better transport protocol engineering ... https://ripe77.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/bcop-tf/ Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ Thames: Variable 3 or 4, becoming southwest 4 or 5 later. Slight. Mainly fair. Good, occasionally poor. ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
Re: [dns-privacy] Implementer Perspective
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:20 AM Brian Haberman wrote: > All, > This week (10/15 - 10/21) let's focus on the implementer's > perspective on DNS privacy between recursive resolvers and authoritative > servers. >From authoritative server perspective, but really the question can be flipped over and would apply to recursive server. - how to signal to a recursive resolver availability of privacy channel. - how to let recursive resolver authenticate authoritative servers. Manu > > This topic does not appear to have any previously stated views, so > let's work through any impacts on the code bases. > > Regards, > Brian > > On 7/19/18 2:24 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > > This thread is for discussion of the implementer perspective of DNS > > privacy between the recursive resolver and authoritative servers. > > > > - Focus on *what* is needed. > > - Avoid *how* to achieve it. > > - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange. > > - Scenarios will frame the discussion. > > > > > > > > ___ > > dns-privacy mailing list > > dns-privacy@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > > > ___ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
Re: [dns-privacy] Implementer Perspective
All, This week (10/15 - 10/21) let's focus on the implementer's perspective on DNS privacy between recursive resolvers and authoritative servers. This topic does not appear to have any previously stated views, so let's work through any impacts on the code bases. Regards, Brian On 7/19/18 2:24 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: > This thread is for discussion of the implementer perspective of DNS > privacy between the recursive resolver and authoritative servers. > > - Focus on *what* is needed. > - Avoid *how* to achieve it. > - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange. > - Scenarios will frame the discussion. > > > > ___ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
