2012/9/10 Simon Kelley :
> On 09/09/12 06:57, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>> El dom 09 sep 2012 02:03:11 CLST, Shantanu Gadgil escribió:
>>> If this is done, won't the autotools chain will be a prerequisite for
>>> dnsmasq to be built.
>>>
>>> Maybe OK for Linux OSes ... not necessary for other platf
OK, I forwarded my question to an individual who I believe knows much
more about IPV6 than I do and he agrees the dnsmasq should optionally
not forward "private" ipv6 packets.
Now, I believe that a "bogus-priv6" would be useful but this is only at
some border between an internal network and an
Am 10.09.2012 04:05, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
> El 09/09/12 22:10, richardvo...@gmail.com escribió:
>> Completely aside from arguments over the merits of autotools, this
>> patch is not production-ready.
>>
>> It makes unrelated changes. Removal of the copyright notice is
>> certainly not neces
Am 09.09.2012 18:42, schrieb Jan Seiffert:
> Shantanu Gadgil schrieb:
>> I would respectfully ask you to re-evaluate the "what most people
>> use" statement. The simplicity of DNSMasq is what makes it so
>> popular.
>>
>
> I would say yes to the simplicity.
> But i would not search it in the build
Am 08.09.2012 23:16, schrieb Cristian Rodríguez:
> ---
> Makefile | 134
> -
> Makefile.am | 16 +++
> configure.ac | 113
> src/bpf.c |4 ++
> src/cache.c
Am 10.09.2012 11:27, schrieb Simon Kelley:
> On 09/09/12 06:57, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>> El dom 09 sep 2012 02:03:11 CLST, Shantanu Gadgil escribió:
>>> If this is done, won't the autotools chain will be a prerequisite for
>>> dnsmasq to be built.
>>>
>>> Maybe OK for Linux OSes ... not necessa
On 09/09/12 06:57, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El dom 09 sep 2012 02:03:11 CLST, Shantanu Gadgil escribió:
>> If this is done, won't the autotools chain will be a prerequisite for
>> dnsmasq to be built.
>>
>> Maybe OK for Linux OSes ... not necessary for other platforms/OSes
>> (think Solaris, AIX
I've installed Dnsmasq without any problem on a Linux Mint machine,
running as a quasi-dns-server for my home office network with a DSL
internet connection. Dns only, no dhcp.
We´re mostly a Mac shop, and have discovered the hard way that 10.8
server running Open Directory is even more depende
