On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Simon Kelley
wrote:
> On 04/05/15 12:42, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way to set the lease time for a client derived from the
> > /etc/ethers file?
> >
> > I can set a lease time for a lease derived from a “dhcp-range” or
> > “dhcp-host” config statement
* Simon Kelley [08.05.2015 22:36]:
> Are you sure the low-memory thing is relevant? Do you see the same
> problem on a newly booted machine?
i'am not sure, if the lowmem-situation is relevant.
on a newly booted machine there are no problems.
> The logs you include are odd. Doing DHCP on the loop
Thanks for the heads-up. I just checked in code to the git repo to fix this.
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=b059c96dc69dfe3055c5b32b078a05c53b11ebb3
Cheers,
Simon.
On 30/04/15 02:59, Jordan Milne wrote:
> dnsmasq correctly filters A records containing RFC1918 addres
Yan
I believe you will need to setup firewall rules. An easy way to do
that in my opinion is Untangle's Next Generation FireWall (NGFW). It
includes dnsmasq with a GUI for configuration. It can handle the
VLAN's
http://wiki.untangle.com/index.php/Installation
4 interfaces but 3 NICs with one for
On 04/05/15 12:42, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> Is there any way to set the lease time for a client derived from the
> /etc/ethers file?
>
> I can set a lease time for a lease derived from a “dhcp-range” or
> “dhcp-host” config statement, but I can’t find any way to set it for
> the “implied” dhcp-host
What is the content of your /etc/resolv.conf file?
Cheers,
Simon.
On 04/05/15 16:10, Lorenzo Milesi wrote:
> hi.
> I'm experiencing a strange issue with dnsmasq 2.68 bundled in Ubuntu 12.04:
> sometimes my custom DNS records are skipped, and the upstream reply is
> returned.
> For example I
On 05/08/2015 11:59 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
domain = dmz.lan, 192.168.3.0/24
domain = auth.lan, 192.168.4.0/24
Perfect, thank you. The rest of it I got done with iptables.
___
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
htt
Are you sure the low-memory thing is relevant? Do you see the same
problem on a newly booted machine?
The logs you include are odd. Doing DHCP on the loopback interface is
unusual, and may be a cause.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 30/04/15 11:16, Bastian Bittorf wrote:
> (only CC'ing to openwrt-dev)
>
On 03/05/15 01:45, Yan Seiner wrote:
> I have a router with 4 subnets, each on its own interface. (Yes, I'm
> using vlans for 3 of them.)
>
> 192.168.3.0 eth2<- dmz.lan
> 192.168.4.0 eth1.4<- auth.lan
> 192.168.5.0 eth1.5<- guest.lan
> 192.168.6.0 eth1.6<- tena
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
> On 07/05/15 16:51, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
>> One important consideration: The Internet has decreed a long time
>> ago that fragments don't work for IPv4, and REALLY don't work for
>> IPv6: the amount of systems that drop fragments for V6 is of
On 08/05/15 16:52, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>> On 07/05/15 16:51, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
>>> One important consideration: The Internet has decreed a long time
>>> ago that fragments don't work for IPv4, and REALLY don't work for
>>> IPv6: t
Forwarding something from a parallel conversation to the list.
Simon.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: testing edns0 on bind
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 09:58:56 -0700
From: Evan Hunt
To: Simon Kelley
CC: Dave Taht , Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
> This is my hypothesis, which fits what
On 07/05/15 16:51, Nicholas Weaver wrote:
> One important consideration: The Internet has decreed a long time
> ago that fragments don't work for IPv4, and REALLY don't work for
> IPv6: the amount of systems that drop fragments for V6 is off the
> chart.
>
> For DNS, this means you get silent
13 matches
Mail list logo
