On 24/10/2018 16:25, Petr Mensik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have not managed it until dnsmasq 2.80 were out, but anyway. I have
> some proposal to simplify handling of options bits. Static analysis
> complains on compiler dead-code optimization. I propose having array
> instead. It adds few defines. But
The dnsmasq code has a range of binary compile-time options, implemented
conventionally using the C pre-processor. These options are mutually
independent, so the numnber of different versions scales as 2^n. To keep
this managable, I'm trying to limit the number of options.
I've already removed
Hi!
I have not managed it until dnsmasq 2.80 were out, but anyway. I have
some proposal to simplify handling of options bits. Static analysis
complains on compiler dead-code optimization. I propose having array
instead. It adds few defines. But it allows adding any bits to defines
and moving
