-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/03/15 19:05, Kincl, Jason C. wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for bringing up such an old thread but I was circling back
onto this problem and I wonder if we could revisit it.
What about dhcp-host=*,tag:cid0,192.168.2.99? This syntax already
exists
Hi,
Sorry for bringing up such an old thread but I was circling back onto this
problem and I wonder if we could revisit it.
On 17/09/14 09:49, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
Hi Simon,
I've found a little problem with how Option 82 circuit-id/remote-id
works. Everything is fine in the below setup
Hi Simon,
I've found a little problem with how Option 82 circuit-id/remote-id
works. Everything is fine in the below setup until I replace the client
with a replacement unit that has a different MAC.
[client]---LAN1---[dhcrelay]---LAN2---[dnsmasq]
...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
dnsmasq-discuss-requ...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk wrote:
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:49:16 +0200
From: Joachim Nilsson troglo...@gmail.com
To: dnsmasq discuss dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
Subject: [Dnsmasq-discuss] No new lease for Option 82 requests until
old
On 17/09/14 09:49, Joachim Nilsson wrote:
Hi Simon,
I've found a little problem with how Option 82 circuit-id/remote-id
works. Everything is fine in the below setup until I replace the client
with a replacement unit that has a different MAC.
On 17/09/14 21:47, Simon Kelley wrote:
To make this work, you'd need some extra semantics, either explicit or
implicit, to enable the old binding to be abandoned. Abandoning a
binding is dangerous, since when it granted the lease, the server was
promising the client exclusive use of the IP
