Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Difference between SLAAC and RA-ONLY mode

2013-12-19 Thread Simon Kelley
On 19/12/13 04:02, Shixiong Shang wrote: I just found a workaround….If I replaced “slaac” mode with “static” mode, then it just worked fine…But I don’t understand why it worked. :( What version of dnsmasq are you using? That command line doesn't generate an error with the latest code. Ch

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Difference between SLAAC and RA-ONLY mode

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
I am using version 2.66. > On Dec 19, 2013, at 5:31 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: > >> On 19/12/13 04:02, Shixiong Shang wrote: >> I just found a workaround….If I replaced “slaac” mode with “static” mode, >> then it just worked fine…But I don’t understand why it worked. :( > > What version of dnsm

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Difference between SLAAC and RA-ONLY mode

2013-12-19 Thread Simon Kelley
On 18/12/13 15:21, Shixiong Shang wrote: > Hi, Simon: > > This is very helpful! Thanks a lot for your confirmation! > > A quick question, is there any way we can set M-bit to 1 and set > A-bit to 0? In other words, I am trying to force VM to use DHCPv6 > only, but not SLAAC? Yes, configure the d

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Can't get other configutations in stateless dhcpv6 mod!.

2013-12-19 Thread Simon Kelley
On 19/12/13 13:59, Jian Lee wrote: Thanks for your reply! you are right,the vm do not send dhcpv6 request.I use Fedora16 to create vms,and the config in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 is below: -- DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT

[Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-Stateless mode question

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, expert: I am using the dnsmasq in DHCPv6 Stateless mode. Based on the sniffer trace, I saw my DHCPv6 client solicit optional information, but dnsmasq replied with nothing. The log showed “no address available”….Anything I did wrong? In addition, I saw in the man page that there is another w

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Difference between SLAAC and RA-ONLY mode

2013-12-19 Thread Shixiong Shang
Tried and verified it! Working pretty well now! Thanks, Simon! Shixiong On Dec 19, 2013, at 10:48 AM, Simon Kelley wrote: > On 18/12/13 15:21, Shixiong Shang wrote: >> Hi, Simon: >> >> This is very helpful! Thanks a lot for your confirmation! >> >> A quick question, is there any way we can

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] RA-Stateless mode question

2013-12-19 Thread Simon Kelley
On 19/12/13 17:21, Shixiong Shang wrote: Hi, expert: I am using the dnsmasq in DHCPv6 Stateless mode. Based on the sniffer trace, I saw my DHCPv6 client solicit optional information, but dnsmasq replied with nothing. The log showed “no address available”….Anything I did wrong? Most probably, i