Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Dnsmasq as dhcp relay agent for another dnsmasq server

2014-07-31 Thread Prashant
Hi, Actually you are right. Sorry for that. I am using v2.59 which is Ubuntu Repository I had one question , maybe out of scope, Is it possible to use Coova and Dnsmasq on same host and by turning off coova's DHCP and using Dnsmasq as DHCP Server? Thanks, Prashant On Thursday 31 July 2014

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Support for reading the ISC dhcp lease file

2014-07-31 Thread Michael Tremer
Hello Simon, thanks for your reply. On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 22:24 +0100, Simon Kelley wrote: On 30/07/14 11:51, Michael Tremer wrote: Hello fellow dnsmasq users, I am working on the free firewall distribution called IPFire (www.ipfire.org) and inside of that distribution, dnsmasq is used

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Documented Redundancy?

2014-07-31 Thread Simon Kelley
On 30/07/14 07:35, Joel Krauska wrote: I've seen a few interesting proposals for running dnsmasq in a redundant way. (running active/passive and trying to keep leases updated atomically, eg. using a db) But I haven't seen an actual implementation documented anywhere. Those concepts

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Documented Redundancy?

2014-07-31 Thread Gui Iribarren
On 31/07/14 13:23, Simon Kelley wrote: On 30/07/14 07:35, Joel Krauska wrote: I've seen a few interesting proposals for running dnsmasq in a redundant way. (running active/passive and trying to keep leases updated atomically, eg. using a db) But I haven't seen an actual implementation

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Estimation of TFTP Server Load Capabilities

2014-07-31 Thread Simon Kelley
On 24/07/14 04:13, Linux Luser wrote: I have a project where I use dnsmasq for netboot installs. Currently, there can be an unlimited number of installs happened at once. At what point (number of TFTP transfers happening in parallel) should I be concerned that I'm overtaxing dnsmasq's TFTP

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] With --all-servers option enabled, query failed due to first answer with no answer section

2014-07-31 Thread Simon Kelley
On 24/07/14 08:20, 毕勤 wrote: Well,I just figured out that it might due to the DNS Hijack of China's Great Firewall. The GFW hijack the DNS process and return a fake response pacakge,with the response code=0(means no error) but no Answer RRs(Answer RRs=0).It's obviously unlogical but

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Estimation of TFTP Server Load Capabilities

2014-07-31 Thread Brian Rak
One option here is to use iPXE ( http://www.ipxe.org/ ) to grab the netboot files via HTTP (or some other protocol) instead of relying on TFTP. There's some extra configuration work here, but serving up the 365KB iPXE image to clients via TFTP is a lot less work then serving up the entire

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Estimation of TFTP Server Load Capabilities

2014-07-31 Thread Linux Luser
Thanks guys. That gives me some good things to think about and prepare for. On Jul 31, 2014 12:33 PM, Brian Rak b...@gameservers.com wrote: One option here is to use iPXE ( http://www.ipxe.org/ ) to grab the netboot files via HTTP (or some other protocol) instead of relying on TFTP. There's