Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] WG: clients of DHCPv6 with constructed IPv6 address range are not notified on address range change

2018-09-17 Thread Simon Kelley
On 15/09/18 10:05, Andrey Vakhitov wrote: > Hello Uwe, > >>> My recommendation to the reporter: >>> - Don't use stateful DHCPv6 in Germany, that does not work well. You >>> clients should get the addresses using router advertisements. For static > hosts assign static names in your own domain.

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] clients of DHCPv6 with constructed IPv6 address range are not notified on address range change

2018-09-17 Thread Simon Kelley
On 10/09/18 19:51, Andrey Vakhitov wrote: > Hello Simon & Uwe, > >> unfortunately that problem is seen often with providers in Germany, although >> the large ones no longer >> do it (or allow to disable the disconnect). The problem is that German >> providers automatically >> disconnect the

Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] CERT Vulnerability VU#598349

2018-09-17 Thread Simon Kelley
On 10/09/18 00:19, klondike wrote: > Hi Simon, > > El 08/09/18 a las 19:17, Simon Kelley escribió: >> The question is, should the above configuration be "baked in" to the code? > > Yes. In general it is considered against good practice to provide insane > defaults and in this case this entails