On 09/28/2018 06:46 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 28/09/18 23:07, Marc Heckmann wrote:
Very nice, I will test this.
I am curious though: what will be used for the NS record if the
auth-server configuration is omitted?
It appears to return an NS record of "." ie the DNS root. Which is not
partic
On 28/09/18 23:07, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> Very nice, I will test this.
>
> I am curious though: what will be used for the NS record if the
> auth-server configuration is omitted?
It appears to return an NS record of "." ie the DNS root. Which is not
particularly sensible. This may need some more
Very nice, I will test this.
I am curious though: what will be used for the NS record if the auth-server
configuration is omitted?
-m
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:42 PM Simon Kelley
wrote:
> On 28/09/18 02:33, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm currently running dnsmasq in a Docker cont
On 28/09/18 02:33, Marc Heckmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently running dnsmasq in a Docker container and have setup a
> domain for which dnsmasq is to be authoritative for. This is to do
> subdomain delegation to the dnsmasq server. I am using the auth-server &
> auth-zone configuration option
